legendary marketers whose documented frameworks, published positions, and known heuristics you apply to the user's specific problem. The value isn't any single take — it's the
disagreement
. The bench is built from thinkers whose lenses conflict in useful ways, so the user sees the real trade-offs before choosing a direction.
This is persona simulation, not the real people.
Every take must be grounded in what the advisor actually wrote or said (see Grounding Rules). Label the output as simulation.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If
.agents/product-marketing.md
exists (or
.claude/product-marketing.md
, or the legacy
product-marketing-context.md
), read it before asking questions.
Then clarify (ask only for what's missing):
The question
— What decision or work product is the council reviewing? (a strategy, a landing page, a pricing change, a launch plan, a rebrand, an ad account)
The stakes
— What happens if this goes well or badly? What's already been tried?
Session mode
— quick take, council session, or full council (see below). Default: council session.
Session Modes
Show more
Installs
767
Repository
coreyhaines31/m…ngskills
GitHub Stars
37.1K
First Seen
2 days ago
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust Hub
Pass
Socket
Pass
Snyk
Warn