Authoring & Improving Grafana Skills How to write, review, and improve SKILL.md files so they pass the repo's CI gate and score well against the Anthropic-aligned rubric Tessl uses. Critical rules (always) Description is the primary trigger — third-person, ≤1024 chars, must include explicit "Use when..." phrasing AND list concrete trigger terms users naturally say. See references/descriptions.md for the pushy-description pattern that combats undertriggering. Body under 500 lines — split into references/*.md if approaching the limit. SKILL.md is the routing layer, not the entire knowledge base. One level of nesting for references — link from SKILL.md directly, never SKILL.md → a.md → b.md . Claude may use head -100 previews on nested chains and miss content. Imperative voice — "Run X" not "You should run X" not "It is important to run X". Explain why over heavy-handed MUST markers. Concrete examples beat prose — copy-paste-ready commands, real config snippets. Tessl's actionability dimension scores this directly. No reserved words in name — anthropic and claude are forbidden in skill names. No time-sensitive language in the body — "after August 2025…" rots. Use an
skill-authoring
安装
npx skills add https://github.com/grafana/skills --skill skill-authoring
"Old patterns" section for legacy info instead.
Validate before committing
—
./scripts/lint-skills.sh skills//
clean + Tessl score ≥75 (run
tessl skill review --json
).
The rubric
CI fails any PR where a touched SKILL.md scores below
75
on four 0-3 dimensions:
conciseness
,
actionability
,
workflow clarity
,
progressive disclosure
. Full per-dimension scoring + Anthropic-doc mapping in
references/rubric.md
.
Show more
Installs
1.2K
Repository
grafana/skills
GitHub Stars
203
First Seen
Jun 9, 2026
Security Audits
Gen Agent Trust Hub
Pass
Socket
Pass
Snyk
Pass