Ownership & Lifetimes
Layer 1: Language Mechanics
Core Question
Who should own this data, and for how long?
Before fixing ownership errors, understand the data's role:
Is it shared or exclusive? Is it short-lived or long-lived? Is it transformed or just read? Error → Design Question Error Don't Just Say Ask Instead E0382 "Clone it" Who should own this data? E0597 "Extend lifetime" Is the scope boundary correct? E0506 "End borrow first" Should mutation happen elsewhere? E0507 "Clone before move" Why are we moving from a reference? E0515 "Return owned" Should caller own the data? E0716 "Bind to variable" Why is this temporary? E0106 "Add 'a" What is the actual lifetime relationship? Thinking Prompt
Before fixing an ownership error, ask:
What is this data's domain role?
Entity (unique identity) → owned Value Object (interchangeable) → clone/copy OK Temporary (computation result) → maybe restructure
Is the ownership design intentional?
By design → work within constraints Accidental → consider redesign
Fix symptom or redesign?
If Strike 3 (3rd attempt) → escalate to Layer 2 Trace Up ↑
When errors persist, trace to design layer:
E0382 (moved value) ↑ Ask: What design choice led to this ownership pattern? ↑ Check: m09-domain (is this Entity or Value Object?) ↑ Check: domain-* (what constraints apply?)
Persistent Error Trace To Question E0382 repeated m02-resource Should use Arc/Rc for sharing? E0597 repeated m09-domain Is scope boundary at right place? E0506/E0507 m03-mutability Should use interior mutability? Trace Down ↓
From design decisions to implementation:
"Data needs to be shared immutably"
↓ Use: Arc
"Data needs exclusive ownership" ↓ Use: move semantics, take ownership
"Data is read-only view" ↓ Use: &T (immutable borrow)
Quick Reference
Pattern Ownership Cost Use When
Move Transfer Zero Caller doesn't need data
&T Borrow Zero Read-only access
&mut T Exclusive borrow Zero Need to modify
clone() Duplicate Alloc + copy Actually need a copy
Rc