frontend-code-review

安装量: 3.5K
排名: #619

安装

npx skills add https://github.com/langgenius/dify --skill frontend-code-review

Frontend Code Review Intent

Use this skill whenever the user asks to review frontend code (especially .tsx, .ts, or .js files). Support two review modes:

Pending-change review – inspect staged/working-tree files slated for commit and flag checklist violations before submission. File-targeted review – review the specific file(s) the user names and report the relevant checklist findings.

Stick to the checklist below for every applicable file and mode.

Checklist

See references/code-quality.md, references/performance.md, references/business-logic.md for the living checklist split by category—treat it as the canonical set of rules to follow.

Flag each rule violation with urgency metadata so future reviewers can prioritize fixes.

Review Process Open the relevant component/module. Gather lines that relate to class names, React Flow hooks, prop memoization, and styling. For each rule in the review point, note where the code deviates and capture a representative snippet. Compose the review section per the template below. Group violations first by Urgent flag, then by category order (Code Quality, Performance, Business Logic). Required output

When invoked, the response must exactly follow one of the two templates:

Template A (any findings)

Code review

Found urgent issues need to be fixed:

1

FilePath: line

Suggested fix


... (repeat for each urgent issue) ...

Found suggestions for improvement:

1

FilePath: line

Suggested fix


... (repeat for each suggestion) ...

If there are no urgent issues, omit that section. If there are no suggestions, omit that section.

If the issue number is more than 10, summarize as "10+ urgent issues" or "10+ suggestions" and just output the first 10 issues.

Don't compress the blank lines between sections; keep them as-is for readability.

If you use Template A (i.e., there are issues to fix) and at least one issue requires code changes, append a brief follow-up question after the structured output asking whether the user wants you to apply the suggested fix(es). For example: "Would you like me to use the Suggested fix section to address these issues?"

Template B (no issues)

Code review

No issues found.

返回排行榜