- Create an Asset
- Generate custom sales assets tailored to your prospect, audience, and goals. Supports interactive landing pages, presentation decks, executive one-pagers, and workflow/architecture demos.
- Triggers
- Invoke this skill when:
- User says
- /create-an-asset
- or
- /create-an-asset [CompanyName]
- User asks to "create an asset", "build a demo", "make a landing page", "mock up a workflow"
- User needs a customer-facing deliverable for a sales conversation
- Overview
- This skill creates professional sales assets by gathering context about:
- (a) The Prospect
- — company, contacts, conversations, pain points
- (b) The Audience
- — who's viewing, what they care about
- (c) The Purpose
- — goal of the asset, desired next action
- (d) The Format
- — landing page, deck, one-pager, or workflow demo
- The skill then researches, structures, and builds a polished, branded asset ready to share with customers.
- Phase 0: Context Detection & Input Collection
- Step 0.1: Detect Seller Context
- From the user's email domain, identify what company they work for.
- Actions:
- Extract domain from user's email
- Search:
- "[domain]" company products services site:linkedin.com OR site:crunchbase.com
- Determine seller context:
- Scenario
- Action
- Single-product company
- Auto-populate seller context
- Multi-product company
- Ask: "Which product or solution is this asset for?"
- Consultant/agency/generic domain
- Ask: "What company or product are you representing?"
- Unknown/startup
- Ask: "Briefly, what are you selling?"
- Store seller context:
- seller
- :
- company
- :
- "[Company Name]"
- product
- :
- "[Product/Service]"
- value_props
- :
- -
- "[Key value prop 1]"
- -
- "[Key value prop 2]"
- -
- "[Key value prop 3]"
- differentiators
- :
- -
- "[Differentiator 1]"
- -
- "[Differentiator 2]"
- pricing_model
- :
- "[If publicly known]"
- Persist to knowledge base
- for future sessions. On subsequent invocations, confirm: "I have your seller context from last time — still selling [Product] at [Company]?"
- Step 0.2: Collect Prospect Context (a)
- Ask the user:
- Field
- Prompt
- Required
- Company
- "Which company is this asset for?"
- ✓ Yes
- Key contacts
- "Who are the key contacts? (names, roles)"
- No
- Deal stage
- "What stage is this deal?"
- ✓ Yes
- Pain points
- "What pain points or priorities have they shared?"
- No
- Past materials
- "Upload any conversation materials (transcripts, emails, notes, call recordings)"
- No
- Deal stage options:
- Intro / First meeting
- Discovery
- Evaluation / Technical review
- POC / Pilot
- Negotiation
- Close
- Step 0.3: Collect Audience Context (b)
- Ask the user:
- Field
- Prompt
- Required
- Audience type
- "Who's viewing this?"
- ✓ Yes
- Specific roles
- "Any specific titles to tailor for? (e.g., CTO, VP Engineering, CFO)"
- No
- Primary concern
- "What do they care most about?"
- ✓ Yes
- Objections
- "Any concerns or objections to address?"
- No
- Audience type options:
- Executive (C-suite, VPs)
- Technical (Architects, Engineers, Developers)
- Operations (Ops, IT, Procurement)
- Mixed / Cross-functional
- Primary concern options:
- ROI / Business impact
- Technical depth / Architecture
- Strategic alignment
- Risk mitigation / Security
- Implementation / Timeline
- Step 0.4: Collect Purpose Context (c)
- Ask the user:
- Field
- Prompt
- Required
- Goal
- "What's the goal of this asset?"
- ✓ Yes
- Desired action
- "What should the viewer do after seeing this?"
- ✓ Yes
- Goal options:
- Intro / First impression
- Discovery follow-up
- Technical deep-dive
- Executive alignment / Business case
- POC proposal
- Deal close
- Step 0.5: Select Format (d)
- Ask the user:
- "What format works best for this?"
- Format
- Description
- Best For
- Interactive landing page
- Multi-tab page with demos, metrics, calculators
- Exec alignment, intros, value prop
- Deck-style
- Linear slides, presentation-ready
- Formal meetings, large audiences
- One-pager
- Single-scroll executive summary
- Leave-behinds, quick summaries
- Workflow / Architecture demo
- Interactive diagram with animated flow
- Technical deep-dives, POC demos, integrations
- Step 0.6: Format-Specific Inputs
- If "Workflow / Architecture demo" selected:
- First, parse from user's description.
- Look for:
- Systems and components mentioned
- Data flows described
- Human interaction points
- Example scenarios
- Then ask for any gaps:
- If Missing...
- Ask...
- Components unclear
- "What systems or components are involved? (databases, APIs, AI, middleware, etc.)"
- Flow unclear
- "Walk me through the step-by-step flow"
- Human touchpoints unclear
- "Where does a human interact in this workflow?"
- Scenario vague
- "What's a concrete example scenario to demo?"
- Integration specifics
- "Any specific tools or platforms to highlight?"
- Phase 1: Research (Adaptive)
- Assess Context Richness
- Level
- Indicators
- Research Depth
- Rich
- Transcripts uploaded, detailed pain points, clear requirements
- Light — fill gaps only
- Moderate
- Some context, no transcripts
- Medium — company + industry
- Sparse
- Just company name
- Deep — full research pass
- Always Research:
- Prospect basics
- Search:
- "[Company]" annual report investor presentation 2025 2026
- Search:
- "[Company]" CEO strategy priorities 2025 2026
- Extract: Revenue, employees, key metrics, strategic priorities
- Leadership
- Search:
- "[Company]" CEO CTO CIO 2025
- Extract: Names, titles, recent quotes on strategy/technology
- Brand colors
- Search:
- "[Company]" brand guidelines
- Or extract from company website
- Store: Primary color, secondary color, accent
- If Moderate/Sparse Context, Also Research:
- Industry context
- Search:
- "[Industry]" trends challenges 2025 2026
- Extract: Common pain points, market dynamics
- Technology landscape
- Search:
- "[Company]" technology stack tools platforms
- Extract: Current solutions, potential integration points
- Competitive context
- Search:
- "[Company]" vs [seller's competitors]
- Extract: Current solutions, switching signals
- If Transcripts/Materials Uploaded:
- Conversation analysis
- Extract: Stated pain points, decision criteria, objections, timeline
- Identify: Key quotes to reference (use their exact language)
- Note: Specific terminology, acronyms, internal project names
- Phase 2: Structure Decision
- Interactive Landing Page
- Purpose
- Recommended Sections
- Intro
- Company Fit → Solution Overview → Key Use Cases → Why Us → Next Steps
- Discovery follow-up
- Their Priorities → How We Help → Relevant Examples → ROI Framework → Next Steps
- Technical deep-dive
- Architecture → Security & Compliance → Integration → Performance → Support
- Exec alignment
- Strategic Fit → Business Impact → ROI Calculator → Risk Mitigation → Partnership
- POC proposal
- Scope → Success Criteria → Timeline → Team → Investment → Next Steps
- Deal close
- Value Summary → Pricing → Implementation Plan → Terms → Sign-off
- Audience adjustments:
- Executive
-
- Lead with business impact, ROI, strategic alignment
- Technical
-
- Lead with architecture, security, integration depth
- Operations
-
- Lead with workflow impact, change management, support
- Mixed
-
- Balance strategic + tactical; use tabs to separate depth levels
- Deck-Style
- Same sections as landing page, formatted as linear slides:
- 1. Title slide (Prospect + Seller logos, partnership framing)
- 2. Agenda
- 3-N. One section per slide (or 2-3 slides for dense sections)
- N+1. Summary / Key takeaways
- N+2. Next steps / CTA
- N+3. Appendix (optional — detailed specs, pricing, etc.)
- Slide principles:
- One key message per slide
- Visual > text-heavy
- Use prospect's metrics and language
- Include speaker notes
- One-Pager
- Condense to single-scroll format:
- ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
- │ HERO: "[Prospect Goal] with [Product]" │
- ├─────────────────────────────────────┤
- │ KEY POINT 1 │ KEY POINT 2 │ KEY POINT 3 │
- │ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │
- │ sentences] │ sentences] │ sentences] │
- ├─────────────────────────────────────┤
- │ PROOF POINT: [Metric, quote, or case study] │
- ├─────────────────────────────────────┤
- │ CTA: [Clear next action] │ [Contact info] │
- └─────────────────────────────────────┘
- Workflow / Architecture Demo
- Structure based on complexity:
- Complexity
- Components
- Structure
- Simple
- 3-5
- Single-view diagram with step annotations
- Medium
- 5-10
- Zoomable canvas with step-by-step walkthrough
- Complex
- 10+
- Multi-layer view (overview → detailed) with guided tour
- Standard elements:
- Title bar
- :
- [Scenario Name] — Powered by [Seller Product]
- Component nodes
-
- Visual boxes/icons for each system
- Flow arrows
-
- Animated connections showing data movement
- Step panel
-
- Sidebar explaining current step in plain language
- Controls
-
- Play / Pause / Step Forward / Step Back / Reset
- Annotations
-
- Callouts for key decision points and value-adds
- Data preview
- Sample payloads or transformations at each step Phase 3: Content Generation General Principles All content should: Reference specific pain points from user input or transcripts Use prospect's language — their terminology, their stated priorities Map seller's product → prospect's needs explicitly Include proof points where available (case studies, metrics, quotes) Feel tailored, not templated Section Templates Hero / Intro Headline: "[Prospect's Goal] with [Seller's Product]" Subhead: Tie to their stated priority or top industry challenge Metrics: 3-4 key facts about the prospect (shows we did homework) Their Priorities (if discovery follow-up) Reference specific pain points from conversation: - Use their exact words where possible - Show we listened and understood - Connect each to how we help Solution Mapping For each pain point: ├── The challenge (in their words) ├── How [Product] addresses it ├── Proof point or example └── Outcome / benefit Use Cases / Demos 3-5 relevant use cases: ├── Visual mockup or interactive demo ├── Business impact (quantified if possible) ├── "How it works" — 3-4 step summary └── Relevant to their industry/role ROI / Business Case Interactive calculator with: ├── Inputs relevant to their business (from research) │ ├── Number of users/developers │ ├── Current costs or time spent │ └── Expected improvement % ├── Outputs: │ ├── Annual value / savings │ ├── Cost of solution │ ├── Net ROI │ └── Payback period └── Assumptions clearly stated (editable) Why Us / Differentiators ├── Differentiators vs. alternatives they might consider ├── Trust, security, compliance positioning ├── Support and partnership model └── Customer proof points (logos, quotes, case studies) Next Steps / CTA ├── Clear action aligned to Purpose (c) ├── Specific next step (not vague "let's chat") ├── Contact information ├── Suggested timeline └── What happens after they take action Workflow Demo Content Component Definitions For each system, define: component : id : "snowflake" label : "Snowflake Data Warehouse" type : "database"
database | api | ai | middleware | human | document | output
icon : "database" description : "Financial performance data" brand_color : "#29B5E8" Component types: human — Person initiating or receiving document — PDFs, contracts, files ai — AI/ML models, agents database — Data stores, warehouses api — APIs, services middleware — Integration platforms, MCP servers output — Dashboards, reports, notifications Flow Steps For each step, define: step : number : 1 from : "human" to : "claude" action : "Initiates performance review" description : "Sarah, a Brand Analyst at [Prospect], kicks off the quarterly review..." data_example : "Review request: Nike brand, Q4 2025" duration : "~1 second" value_note : "No manual data gathering required" Scenario Narrative Write a clear, specific walkthrough: Step 1: Human Trigger "Sarah, a Brand Performance Analyst at Centric Brands, needs to review Q4 performance for the Nike license agreement. She opens the review dashboard and clicks 'Start Review'..." Step 2: Contract Analysis "Claude retrieves the Nike contract PDF and extracts the performance obligations: minimum $50M revenue, 12% margin requirement, quarterly reporting deadline..." Step 3: Data Query "Claude formulates a query and sends it to Workato DataGenie: 'Get Q4 2025 revenue and gross margin for Nike brand from Snowflake'..." Step 4: Results & Synthesis "Snowflake returns the data. Claude compares actuals vs. obligations: Revenue $52.3M ✓ (exceeded by $2.3M) Margin 11.2% ⚠️ (0.8% below threshold)..." Step 5: Insight Delivery "Claude synthesizes findings into an executive summary with recommendations: 'Review promotional spend allocation to improve margin performance...'" Phase 4: Visual Design Color System :root { / === Prospect Brand (Primary) === / --brand-primary :
[extracted from research]
; --brand-secondary :
[extracted]
; --brand-primary-rgb : [r , g , b] ; / For rgba() usage / / === Dark Theme Base === / --bg-primary :
0a0d14
; --bg-elevated :
0f131c
; --bg-surface :
161b28
; --bg-hover :
1e2536
; / === Text === / --text-primary :
ffffff
; --text-secondary : rgba ( 255 , 255 , 255 , 0.7 ) ; --text-muted : rgba ( 255 , 255 , 255 , 0.5 ) ; / === Accent === / --accent : var ( --brand-primary ) ; --accent-hover : var ( --brand-secondary ) ; --accent-glow : rgba ( var ( --brand-primary-rgb ) , 0.3 ) ; / === Status === / --success :
10b981
; --warning :
f59e0b
; --error :
ef4444
; } Typography / Primary: Clean, professional sans-serif / font-family : 'Inter' , -apple-system , BlinkMacSystemFont , sans-serif ; / Headings / h1 : 2.5 rem , font-weight : 700 h2 : 1.75 rem , font-weight : 600 h3 : 1.25 rem , font-weight : 600 / Body / body : 1 rem , font-weight : 400 , line-height : 1.6 / Captions/Labels / small : 0.875 rem , font-weight : 500 Visual Elements Cards: Background: var(--bg-surface) Border: 1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.1) Border-radius: 12px Box-shadow: subtle, layered Hover: slight elevation, border glow Buttons: Primary: var(--accent) background, white text Secondary: transparent, accent border Hover: brightness increase, subtle scale Animations: Transitions: 200-300ms ease Tab switches: fade + slide Hover states: smooth, not jarring Loading: subtle pulse or skeleton Workflow Demo Specific Component Nodes: .node { background : var ( --bg-surface ) ; border : 2 px solid var ( --brand-primary ) ; border-radius : 12 px ; padding : 16 px ; min-width : 140 px ; } .node .active { box-shadow : 0 0 20 px var ( --accent-glow ) ; border-color : var ( --accent ) ; } .node .human { border-color :
f59e0b
; / Warm color for humans / } .node .ai { background : linear-gradient ( 135 deg , var ( --bg-surface ) , var ( --bg-elevated ) ) ; border-color : var ( --accent ) ; } Flow Arrows: .arrow { stroke : var ( --text-muted ) ; stroke-width : 2 ; fill : none ; marker-end : url (
arrowhead
- )
- ;
- }
- .arrow
- .active
- {
- stroke
- :
- var
- (
- --accent
- )
- ;
- stroke-dasharray
- :
- 8
- 4
- ;
- animation
- :
- flowDash
- 1
- s
- linear infinite
- ;
- }
- Canvas:
- .canvas
- {
- background
- :
- radial-gradient
- (
- circle at center
- ,
- var
- (
- --bg-elevated
- )
- 0
- %
- ,
- var
- (
- --bg-primary
- )
- 100
- %
- )
- ,
- url
- (
- "data:image/svg+xml,..."
- )
- ;
- / Subtle grid pattern /
- overflow
- :
- auto
- ;
- }
- Phase 5: Clarifying Questions (REQUIRED)
- Before building any asset, always ask clarifying questions.
- This ensures alignment and prevents wasted effort.
- Step 5.1: Summarize Understanding
- First, show the user what you understood:
- "Here's what I'm planning to build:
- Asset: [Format] for [Prospect Company]
- Audience: [Audience type] — specifically [roles if known]
- Goal: [Purpose] → driving toward [desired action]
- Key themes: [2-3 main points to emphasize]
- [For workflow demos, also show:]
- Components: [List of systems]
- Flow: [Step 1] → [Step 2] → [Step 3] → ...
- Step 5.2: Ask Standard Questions (ALL formats)
- Question
- Why
- "Does this match your vision?"
- Confirm understanding
- "What's the ONE thing this must nail to succeed?"
- Focus on priority
- "Tone preference? (Bold & confident / Consultative / Technical & precise)"
- Style alignment
- "Focused and concise, or comprehensive?"
- Scope calibration
- Step 5.3: Ask Format-Specific Questions
- Interactive Landing Page:
- "Which sections matter most for this audience?"
- "Any specific demos or use cases to highlight?"
- "Should I include an ROI calculator?"
- "Any competitor positioning to address?"
- Deck-Style:
- "How long is the presentation? (helps with slide count)"
- "Presenting live, or a leave-behind?"
- "Any specific flow or narrative arc in mind?"
- One-Pager:
- "What's the single most important message?"
- "Any specific proof point or stat to feature?"
- "Will this be printed or digital?"
- Workflow / Architecture Demo:
- "Let me confirm the components: [list]. Anything missing?"
- "Here's the flow I understood: [steps]. Correct?"
- "Should the demo show realistic sample data, or keep it abstract?"
- "Any integration details to highlight or downplay?"
- "Should viewers be able to click through steps, or auto-play?"
- Step 5.4: Confirm and Proceed
- After user responds:
- "Got it. I have what I need. Building your [format] now..."
- Or, if still unclear:
- "One more quick question: [specific follow-up]"
- Max 2 rounds of questions.
- If still ambiguous, make a reasonable choice and note: "I went with X — easy to adjust if you prefer Y."
- Phase 6: Build & Deliver
- Build the Asset
- Following all specifications above:
- Generate structure based on Phase 2
- Create content based on Phase 3
- Apply visual design based on Phase 4
- Ensure all interactive elements work
- Test responsiveness (if applicable)
- Output Format
- All formats
- Self-contained HTML file All CSS inline or in