pr-research

安装量: 154
排名: #5584

安装

npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill pr-research
PR Research Skill
Systematic exploration of upstream repositories before contributing.
Overview
Research an external codebase to understand how to contribute effectively.
This is the FIRST step before planning or implementing an open source contribution.
When to Use
:
Before contributing to an external repository
Starting a new open source contribution
Evaluating whether to contribute to a project
When NOT to Use
:
Researching your own codebase (use
$research
)
Already familiar with the project's guidelines
Workflow
-1. Prior Work Check -> BLOCKING: Check for existing issues/PRs
0. CONTRIBUTING.md -> MANDATORY: Find contribution guidelines
1. Repository Setup -> Clone/identify upstream repo
2. Guidelines Analysis -> Templates, CODE_OF_CONDUCT
3. PR Archaeology -> Analyze merged PRs, commit patterns
4. Maintainer Research -> Response patterns, review expectations
5. Issue Discovery -> Find contribution opportunities
6. Output -> Write research document
Phase -1: Prior Work Check (BLOCKING)
CRITICAL
Before ANY research, check if someone is already working on this.

Search for open issues on this topic

gh issue list -R < owner/repo

--state open --search "" --limit 20

Search for open PRs that might address this

gh pr list -R < owner/repo

--state open --search "" --limit 20

Check for recently merged PRs (might already be fixed)

gh
pr
list
-R
<
owner/repo
>
--state
merged
--search
""
--limit
10
Finding
Action
Open issue exists
Link to it, don't create duplicate
Open PR exists
Don't duplicate work
Recently merged PR
Verify fix, no work needed
No prior work found
Proceed to Phase 0
Phase 0: CONTRIBUTING.md Discovery (BLOCKING)
CRITICAL
Do not proceed without finding contribution guidelines.

Check all common locations

cat CONTRIBUTING.md 2

/dev/null cat .github/CONTRIBUTING.md 2

/dev/null cat docs/CONTRIBUTING.md 2

/dev/null

Check README for contribution section

grep
-i
"contribut"
README.md
|
head
-10
Extract Key Requirements
Requirement
Where to Find
Commit format
"Commit messages" section
PR process
"Pull Requests" section
Testing requirements
"Testing" section
Code style
"Style" section
CLA/DCO
"Legal" or "License" section
Phase 3: PR Archaeology
CRITICAL
Understand what successful PRs look like.

List recent merged PRs

gh pr list --state merged --limit 20

Recent commit style

git log --oneline -30 | head -20

Check for conventional commits

git log --oneline -30 | grep -E "^[a-f0-9]+ (feat|fix|docs|refactor|test|chore)((.*))?:" PR Size Analysis Size Files Lines Likelihood Small 1-3 <100 High acceptance Medium 4-10 100-500 Moderate Large 10+ 500+ Needs discussion first Phase 5: Issue Discovery

Find beginner-friendly issues

gh issue list --label "good first issue" --state open gh issue list --label "help wanted" --state open

Issues with no assignee

gh issue list --state open --json assignees,title,number | \ jq -r '.[] | select(.assignees | length == 0) | "#(.number): (.title)"' | head -10 Output Write to .agents/research/YYYY-MM-DD-pr-{repo-slug}.md

PR Research: {repo-name}

Executive Summary

Contribution Guidelines | Document | Status | Key Requirements | |


|

|

| | CONTRIBUTING.md | Present/Missing | {summary} | | PR Template | Present/Missing | {required sections} |

PR Patterns

**
Average size
**

X files, Y lines

**
Commit style
**

{conventional/imperative/etc}

**
Review time
**
~X days

Contribution Opportunities | Issue | Type | Difficulty | |


|

|

N | bug/feat | easy/medium |

Next Steps -> $pr-plan .agents/research/YYYY-MM-DD-pr-{repo}.md Anti-Patterns DON'T DO INSTEAD Skip guidelines check Always read CONTRIBUTING.md first Ignore PR patterns Study successful merged PRs Start with large PRs Begin with small, focused changes Workflow Integration $pr-research -> $pr-plan -> implement -> $pr-prep Examples Research Upstream Before Contributing User says: "Do PR research for owner/repo before I propose a fix." What happens: Inspect contribution guidelines and governance files. Analyze merged PR patterns and conventions. Produce a research artifact with opportunities and risks. Scope Discovery User says: "Find small starter contribution options in this repo." What happens: Scan issues/labels and prior merged work. Classify candidates by difficulty and scope. Recommend a smallest-safe starting contribution. Troubleshooting Problem Cause Solution No contribution guide found Repo lacks standard files Infer conventions from merged PR history and maintainers' comments Too many possible issues Scope not constrained Filter by labels, component paths, and recent maintainer activity Suggested work seems risky Hidden dependency or broad blast radius Downscope to narrower file/domain boundary and restate assumptions Output is too generic Insufficient repository evidence Add concrete file/PR references and explicit pattern findings

返回排行榜