collaborative-plan-with-file

安装量: 59
排名: #12595

安装

npx skills add https://github.com/catlog22/claude-code-workflow --skill collaborative-plan-with-file

Collaborative-Plan-With-File Workflow Quick Start Serial collaborative planning workflow using Plan Note architecture. Analyzes requirements, identifies sub-domains, generates detailed plans per domain serially, and detects conflicts across domains.

Basic usage

/codex:collaborative-plan-with-file "Implement real-time notification system"

With options

/codex:collaborative-plan-with-file
"Refactor authentication module"
--max-domains
=
4
/codex:collaborative-plan-with-file
"Add payment gateway support"
-y
Core workflow
Understand → Template → Serial Domain Planning → Conflict Detection → Completion
Key features
:
plan-note.md
Shared collaborative document with pre-allocated sections per domain
Serial domain planning
Each sub-domain planned sequentially with full codebase context
Conflict detection
Automatic file, dependency, and strategy conflict scanning
No merge needed
Pre-allocated sections eliminate merge conflicts
Auto Mode
When
--yes
or
-y
Auto-approve splits, skip confirmations.
Overview
This workflow enables structured planning through sequential phases:
Understanding & Template
— Analyze requirements, identify sub-domains, create plan-note.md template
Serial Domain Planning
— Plan each sub-domain sequentially using direct search and analysis
Conflict Detection
— Scan plan-note.md for conflicts across all domains
Completion
— Generate human-readable plan.md summary
The key innovation is the
Plan Note
architecture — a shared collaborative document with pre-allocated sections per sub-domain, eliminating merge conflicts even in serial execution.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PLAN NOTE COLLABORATIVE PLANNING │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Phase 1: Understanding & Template Creation │
│ ├─ Analyze requirements (inline search & analysis) │
│ ├─ Identify 2-5 sub-domains (focus areas) │
│ ├─ Create plan-note.md with pre-allocated sections │
│ └─ Assign TASK ID ranges (no conflicts) │
│ │
│ Phase 2: Serial Domain Planning │
│ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Domain 1 │→ Explore codebase → Generate .task/TASK-*.json │
│ │ Section 1 │→ Fill task pool + evidence in plan-note.md │
│ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ ┌──────▼───────┐ │
│ │ Domain 2 │→ Explore codebase → Generate .task/TASK-*.json │
│ │ Section 2 │→ Fill task pool + evidence in plan-note.md │
│ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ ┌──────▼───────┐ │
│ │ Domain N │→ ... │
│ └──────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Phase 3: Conflict Detection (Single Source) │
│ ├─ Parse plan-note.md (all sections) │
│ ├─ Detect file/dependency/strategy conflicts │
│ └─ Update plan-note.md conflict section │
│ │
│ Phase 4: Completion (No Merge) │
│ ├─ Collect domain .task/.json → session .task/.json │
│ ├─ Generate plan.md (human-readable) │
│ └─ Ready for execution │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Output Structure
Schema
:
cat ~/.ccw/workflows/cli-templates/schemas/task-schema.json
{projectRoot}/.workflow/.planning/CPLAN-{slug}-{date}/
├── plan-note.md # ⭐ Core: Requirements + Tasks + Conflicts
├── requirement-analysis.json # Phase 1: Sub-domain assignments
├── domains/ # Phase 2: Per-domain plans
│ ├── {domain-1}/
│ │ └── .task/ # Per-domain task JSON files
│ │ ├── TASK-001.json
│ │ └── ...
│ ├── {domain-2}/
│ │ └── .task/
│ │ ├── TASK-101.json
│ │ └── ...
│ └── ...
├── plan.json # Plan overview (plan-overview-base-schema.json)
├── .task/ # ⭐ Merged task JSON files (all domains)
│ ├── TASK-001.json
│ ├── TASK-101.json
│ └── ...
├── conflicts.json # Phase 3: Conflict report
└── plan.md # Phase 4: Human-readable summary
Output Artifacts
Phase 1: Understanding & Template
Artifact
Purpose
plan-note.md
Collaborative template with pre-allocated task pool and evidence sections per domain
requirement-analysis.json
Sub-domain assignments, TASK ID ranges, complexity assessment
Phase 2: Serial Domain Planning
Artifact
Purpose
domains/{domain}/.task/TASK-*.json
Task JSON files per domain (one file per task with convergence)
Updated
plan-note.md
Task pool and evidence sections filled for each domain
Phase 3: Conflict Detection
Artifact
Purpose
conflicts.json
Detected conflicts with types, severity, and resolutions
Updated
plan-note.md
Conflict markers section populated
Phase 4: Completion
Artifact
Purpose
.task/TASK-*.json
Merged task JSON files from all domains (consumable by unified-execute)
plan.json
Plan overview following plan-overview-base-schema.json
plan.md
Human-readable summary with requirements, tasks, and conflicts
Implementation Details
Session Initialization
Step 0: Initialize Session
const
getUtc8ISOString
=
(
)
=>
new
Date
(
Date
.
now
(
)
+
8
*
60
*
60
*
1000
)
.
toISOString
(
)
// Detect project root
const
projectRoot
=
Bash
(
`
git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd
`
)
.
trim
(
)
// Parse arguments
const
autoMode
=
$
ARGUMENTS
.
includes
(
'--yes'
)
||
$
ARGUMENTS
.
includes
(
'-y'
)
const
maxDomainsMatch
=
$
ARGUMENTS
.
match
(
/
--max-domains=
(
\d
+
)
/
)
const
maxDomains
=
maxDomainsMatch
?
parseInt
(
maxDomainsMatch
[
1
]
)
:
5
// Clean task description
const
taskDescription
=
$
ARGUMENTS
.
replace
(
/
--yes
|
-y
|
--max-domains=
\d
+
/
g
,
''
)
.
trim
(
)
const
slug
=
taskDescription
.
toLowerCase
(
)
.
replace
(
/
[
^
a
-
z
0
-
9
\u4e00
-
\u9fa5
]
+
/
g
,
'-'
)
.
substring
(
0
,
30
)
const
dateStr
=
getUtc8ISOString
(
)
.
substring
(
0
,
10
)
const
sessionId
=
`
CPLAN-
${
slug
}
-
${
dateStr
}
`
const
sessionFolder
=
`
${
projectRoot
}
/.workflow/.planning/
${
sessionId
}
`
// Auto-detect continue: session folder + plan-note.md exists → continue mode
// If continue → load existing state and resume from incomplete phase
Bash
(
`
mkdir -p
${
sessionFolder
}
/domains
`
)
Session Variables
:
sessionId
Unique session identifier
sessionFolder
Base directory for all artifacts
maxDomains
Maximum number of sub-domains (default: 5)
autoMode
Boolean for auto-confirmation
Auto-Detection
If session folder exists with plan-note.md, automatically enters continue mode.
Phase 1: Understanding & Template Creation
Objective
Analyze task requirements, identify parallelizable sub-domains, and create the plan-note.md template with pre-allocated sections.
Step 1.1: Analyze Task Description
Use built-in tools directly to understand the task scope and identify sub-domains.
Analysis Activities
:
Search for references
— Find related documentation, README files, and architecture guides
Use:
mcp__ace-tool__search_context
, Grep, Glob, Read
Run:
ccw spec load --category planning
(if spec system available)
Extract task keywords
— Identify key terms and concepts from the task description
Identify ambiguities
— List any unclear points or multiple possible interpretations
Clarify with user
— If ambiguities found, use AskUserQuestion for clarification
Identify sub-domains
— Split into 2-{maxDomains} parallelizable focus areas based on task complexity
Assess complexity
— Evaluate overall task complexity (Low/Medium/High)
Sub-Domain Identification Patterns
:
Pattern
Keywords
Backend API
服务, 后端, API, 接口
Frontend
界面, 前端, UI, 视图
Database
数据, 存储, 数据库, 持久化
Testing
测试, 验证, QA
Infrastructure
部署, 基础, 运维, 配置
Guideline
Prioritize identifying latest documentation (README, design docs, architecture guides). When ambiguities exist, ask user for clarification instead of assuming interpretations. Step 1.2: Create plan-note.md Template Generate a structured template with pre-allocated sections for each sub-domain. plan-note.md Structure :

session_id : CPLAN - { slug } - { date } original_requirement : "{task description}" created_at : "{ISO timestamp}" complexity : Low | Medium | High sub_domains : [ "{domain-1}" , "{domain-2}" , ... ] domain_task_id_ranges : "{domain-1}" : [ 1 , 100 ] "{domain-2}" : [ 101 , 200 ] status : planning


Sections :

需求理解

— Core objectives, key points, constraints, split strategy

任务池 -

— Pre-allocated task section per domain (TASK-{range})

依赖关系

— Auto-generated after all domains complete

冲突标记

— Populated in Phase 3

上下文证据 -

— Evidence section per domain
TASK ID Range Allocation
Each domain receives a non-overlapping range of 100 IDs (e.g., Domain 1: TASK-001
100, Domain 2: TASK-101
200).
Step 1.3: Generate requirement-analysis.json
Write
(
`
${
sessionFolder
}
/requirement-analysis.json
`
,
JSON
.
stringify
(
{
session_id
:
sessionId
,
original_requirement
:
taskDescription
,
complexity
:
complexity
,
// Low | Medium | High
sub_domains
:
subDomains
.
map
(
sub
=>
(
{
focus_area
:
sub
.
focus_area
,
description
:
sub
.
description
,
task_id_range
:
sub
.
task_id_range
,
estimated_effort
:
sub
.
estimated_effort
,
dependencies
:
sub
.
dependencies
// cross-domain dependencies
}
)
)
,
total_domains
:
subDomains
.
length
}
,
null
,
2
)
)
Success Criteria
:
Latest documentation identified and referenced (if available)
Ambiguities resolved via user clarification (if any found)
2-{maxDomains} clear sub-domains identified
Each sub-domain can be planned independently
Plan Note template includes all pre-allocated sections
TASK ID ranges have no overlap (100 IDs per domain)
Requirements understanding is comprehensive
Phase 2: Serial Sub-Domain Planning
Objective
Plan each sub-domain sequentially, generating detailed plans and updating plan-note.md.
Execution Model
Serial inline execution — each domain explored and planned directly using search tools, one at a time. Step 2.1: User Confirmation (unless autoMode) Display identified sub-domains and confirm before starting. if ( ! autoMode ) { AskUserQuestion ( { questions : [ { question : 已识别 ${ subDomains . length } 个子领域:\n ${ subDomains . map ( ( s , i ) => ${ i + 1 } . ${ s . focus_area } : ${ s . description } ) . join ( '\n' ) } \n\n确认开始规划? , header : "Confirm" , multiSelect : false , options : [ { label : "开始规划" , description : "逐域进行规划" } , { label : "调整拆分" , description : "修改子领域划分" } , { label : "取消" , description : "退出规划" } ] } ] } ) } Step 2.2: Serial Domain Planning For each sub-domain, execute the full planning cycle inline: for ( const sub of subDomains ) { // 1. Create domain directory with .task/ subfolder Bash ( mkdir -p ${ sessionFolder } /domains/ ${ sub . focus_area } /.task ) // 2. Explore codebase for domain-relevant context // Use: mcp__ace-tool__search_context, Grep, Glob, Read // Focus on: // - Modules/components related to this domain // - Existing patterns to follow // - Integration points with other domains // - Architecture constraints // 3. Generate task JSON records (following task-schema.json) const domainTasks = [ // For each task within the assigned ID range: { id : TASK- ${ String ( sub . task_id_range [ 0 ] ) . padStart ( 3 , '0' ) } , title : "..." , description : "..." , // scope/goal of this task type : "feature" , // infrastructure|feature|enhancement|fix|refactor|testing priority : "medium" , // high|medium|low effort : "medium" , // small|medium|large scope : "..." , // Brief scope description depends_on : [ ] , // TASK-xxx references convergence : { criteria : [ "... (testable)" ] , // Testable conditions verification : "... (executable)" , // Command or steps definition_of_done : "... (business language)" } , files : [ // Files to modify { path : "..." , action : "modify" , // modify|create|delete changes : [ "..." ] , // Change descriptions conflict_risk : "low" // low|medium|high } ] , source : { tool : "collaborative-plan-with-file" , session_id : sessionId , original_id : TASK- ${ String ( sub . task_id_range [ 0 ] ) . padStart ( 3 , '0' ) } } } // ... more tasks ] // 4. Write individual task JSON files (one per task) domainTasks . forEach ( task => { Write ( ${ sessionFolder } /domains/ ${ sub . focus_area } /.task/ ${ task . id } .json , JSON . stringify ( task , null , 2 ) ) } ) // 5. Sync summary to plan-note.md // Read current plan-note.md // Locate pre-allocated sections: // - Task Pool: "## 任务池 - ${toTitleCase(sub.focus_area)}" // - Evidence: "## 上下文证据 - ${toTitleCase(sub.focus_area)}" // Fill with task summaries and evidence // Write back plan-note.md } Task Summary Format (for plan-note.md task pool sections):

TASK-{ID}: {Title} [{focus-area}]

**
状态
**

pending

**
类型
**

feature/fix/refactor/enhancement/testing/infrastructure

**
优先级
**

high/medium/low

**
工作量
**

small/medium/large

**
依赖
**

TASK-xxx (if any)

**
范围
**

Brief scope description

**
修改文件
**
:
file-path
(action): change summary
-
**
收敛标准
**
:
-
criteria 1
-
criteria 2
-
**
验证方式
**

executable command or steps

**
完成定义
**
business language definition
Evidence Format
(for plan-note.md evidence sections):
-
**
相关文件
**

file list with relevance

**
现有模式
**

patterns identified

**
约束
**
constraints discovered
Domain Planning Rules
:
Each domain modifies ONLY its pre-allocated sections in plan-note.md
Use assigned TASK ID range exclusively
Include convergence criteria for each task (criteria + verification + definition_of_done)
Include
files[]
with conflict_risk assessment per file
Reference cross-domain dependencies explicitly
Each task record must be self-contained (can be independently consumed by unified-execute)
Step 2.3: Verify plan-note.md Consistency
After all domains are planned, verify the shared document.
Verification Activities
:
Read final plan-note.md
Verify all task pool sections are populated
Verify all evidence sections are populated
Validate TASK ID uniqueness across all domains
Check for any section format inconsistencies
Success Criteria
:
domains/{domain}/.task/TASK-*.json
created for each domain (one file per task)
Each task has convergence (criteria + verification + definition_of_done)
plan-note.md
updated with all task pools and evidence sections
Task summaries follow consistent format
No TASK ID overlaps across domains
Phase 3: Conflict Detection
Objective
Analyze plan-note.md for conflicts across all domain contributions.
Step 3.1: Parse plan-note.md
Extract all tasks from all "任务池" sections and domain .task/*.json files.
// parsePlanNote(markdown)
// - Extract YAML frontmatter between --- markers
// - Scan for heading patterns: /^(#{2,})\s+(.+)$/
// - Build sections array:
// - Return:
// Also load all domain .task/*.json for detailed data
// loadDomainTasks(sessionFolder, subDomains):
// const allTasks = []
// for (const sub of subDomains) {
// const taskDir = ${sessionFolder}/domains/${sub.focus_area}/.task
// const taskFiles = Glob(${taskDir}/TASK-*.json)
// taskFiles.forEach(file => {
// allTasks.push(JSON.parse(Read(file)))
// })
// }
// return allTasks
// extractTasksFromSection(content, sectionHeading)
// - Match: /### (TASK-\d+):\s+(.+?)\s+[(.+?)]/
// - For each: extract taskId, title, author
// - Parse details: status, type, priority, effort, depends_on, files, convergence
// - Return: array of task objects
// parseTaskDetails(content)
// - Extract via regex:
// - /**状态**:\s*(.+)/ → status
// - /**类型**:\s*(.+)/ → type
// - /**优先级**:\s*(.+)/ → priority
// - /**工作量**:\s*(.+)/ → effort
// - /**依赖**:\s*(.+)/ → depends_on (extract TASK-\d+ references)
// - Extract files: /- ([^]+)` ((\w+)):\s*(.+)/ → path, action, change
// - Return:
Step 3.2: Detect Conflicts
Scan all tasks for three categories of conflicts.
Conflict Types
:
Type
Severity
Detection Logic
Resolution
file_conflict
high
Same file:location modified by multiple domains
Coordinate modification order or merge changes
dependency_cycle
critical
Circular dependencies in task graph (DFS detection)
Remove or reorganize dependencies
strategy_conflict
medium
Multiple high-risk tasks in same file from different domains
Review approaches and align on single strategy
Detection Functions
:
// detectFileConflicts(tasks)
// Build fileMap: { "file-path": [{ task_id, task_title, source_domain, changes }] }
// For each file with modifications from multiple domains:
// → conflict: type='file_conflict', severity='high'
// → include: file, tasks_involved, domains_involved, changes
// → resolution: 'Coordinate modification order or merge changes'
// detectDependencyCycles(tasks)
// Build dependency graph:
// DFS with recursion stack to detect cycles:
function
detectCycles
(
tasks
)
{
const
graph
=
new
Map
(
tasks
.
map
(
t
=>
[
t
.
id
,
t
.
depends_on
||
[
]
]
)
)
const
visited
=
new
Set
(
)
,
inStack
=
new
Set
(
)
,
cycles
=
[
]
function
dfs
(
node
,
path
)
{
if
(
inStack
.
has
(
node
)
)
{
cycles
.
push
(
[
...
path
,
node
]
.
join
(
' → '
)
)
;
return
}
if
(
visited
.
has
(
node
)
)
return
visited
.
add
(
node
)
;
inStack
.
add
(
node
)
;
(
graph
.
get
(
node
)
||
[
]
)
.
forEach
(
dep
=>
dfs
(
dep
,
[
...
path
,
node
]
)
)
inStack
.
delete
(
node
)
}
tasks
.
forEach
(
t
=>
{
if
(
!
visited
.
has
(
t
.
id
)
)
dfs
(
t
.
id
,
[
]
)
}
)
return
cycles
}
// detectStrategyConflicts(tasks)
// Group tasks by files they modify (from task.files[].path)
// For each file with tasks from multiple domains:
// Filter for tasks with files[].conflict_risk === 'high' or 'medium'
// If >1 high-risk from different domains:
// → conflict: type='strategy_conflict', severity='medium'
// → resolution: 'Review approaches and align on single strategy'
Step 3.3: Generate Conflict Artifacts
Write conflict results and update plan-note.md.
// 1. Write conflicts.json
Write
(
`
${
sessionFolder
}
/conflicts.json
`
,
JSON
.
stringify
(
{
detected_at
:
getUtc8ISOString
(
)
,
total_tasks
:
allTasks
.
length
,
total_domains
:
subDomains
.
length
,
total_conflicts
:
allConflicts
.
length
,
conflicts
:
allConflicts
//
}
,
null
,
2
)
)
// 2. Update plan-note.md "## 冲突标记" section
// generateConflictMarkdown(conflicts):
// If empty: return '✅ 无冲突检测到'
// For each conflict:
// ### CONFLICT-{padded_index}:
// - 严重程度: critical | high | medium
// - 涉及任务: TASK-xxx, TASK-yyy
// - 涉及领域: domain-a, domain-b
// - 问题详情: (based on conflict type)
// - 建议解决方案: ...
// - 决策状态: [ ] 待解决
// replaceSectionContent(markdown, sectionHeading, newContent):
// Find section heading position via regex
// Find next heading of same or higher level
// Replace content between heading and next section
// If section not found: append at end
Success Criteria
:
All tasks extracted and analyzed
conflicts.json
written with detection results
plan-note.md
updated with conflict markers
All conflict types checked (file, dependency, strategy)
Phase 4: Completion
Objective
Generate human-readable plan summary and finalize workflow. Step 4.1: Collect Domain .task/*.json to Session .task/ Copy all per-domain task JSON files into a single session-level .task/ directory. // Create session-level .task/ directory Bash ( mkdir -p ${ sessionFolder } /.task ) // Collect all domain task files for ( const sub of subDomains ) { const taskDir = ${ sessionFolder } /domains/ ${ sub . focus_area } /.task const taskFiles = Glob ( ${ taskDir } /TASK-*.json ) taskFiles . forEach ( file => { const filename = path . basename ( file ) // Copy domain task file to session .task/ directory Bash ( cp ${ file } ${ sessionFolder } /.task/ ${ filename } ) } ) } Step 4.2: Generate plan.json Generate a plan overview following the plan-overview-base-schema. // Generate plan.json (plan-overview-base-schema) const allTaskFiles = Glob ( ${ sessionFolder } /.task/TASK-*.json ) const taskIds = allTaskFiles . map ( f => JSON . parse ( Read ( f ) ) . id ) . sort ( ) // Guard: skip plan.json if no tasks generated if ( taskIds . length === 0 ) { console . warn ( 'No tasks generated; skipping plan.json' ) } else { const planOverview = { summary : Collaborative plan for: ${ taskDescription } , approach : Multi-domain planning across ${ subDomains . length } sub-domains: ${ subDomains . map ( s => s . focus_area ) . join ( ', ' ) } , task_ids : taskIds , task_count : taskIds . length , complexity : complexity , recommended_execution : "Agent" , _metadata : { timestamp : getUtc8ISOString ( ) , source : "direct-planning" , planning_mode : "direct" , plan_type : "collaborative" , schema_version : "2.0" } } Write ( ${ sessionFolder } /plan.json , JSON . stringify ( planOverview , null , 2 ) ) } // end guard Step 4.3: Generate plan.md Create a human-readable summary from plan-note.md content. plan.md Structure : Section Content Header Session ID, task description, creation time 需求 (Requirements) Copied from plan-note.md "需求理解" section 子领域拆分 (Sub-Domains) Each domain with description, task range, estimated effort 任务概览 (Task Overview) All tasks with complexity, dependencies, and target files 冲突报告 (Conflict Report) Summary of detected conflicts or "无冲突" 执行指令 (Execution) Command to execute the plan const planMd = `

Collaborative Plan

Session: ${ sessionId } Requirement: ${ taskDescription } Created: ${ getUtc8ISOString ( ) } Complexity: ${ complexity } Domains: ${ subDomains . length }

需求理解

${ requirementSection }

子领域拆分

# Focus Area Description TASK Range Effort
${
subDomains
.
map
(
(
s
,
i
)
=>
`
${
i
+
1
}
${
s
.
focus_area
}
${
s
.
description
}
${
s
.
task_id_range
[
0
]
}
-
${
s
.
task_id_range
[
1
]
}
${
s
.
estimated_effort
}
`
)
.
join
(
'\n'
)
}
## 任务概览
${
subDomains
.
map
(
sub
=>
{
const
domainTasks
=
allTasks
.
filter
(
t
=>
t
.
source
?.
original_id
?.
startsWith
(
'TASK'
)
&&
t
.
source
?.
session_id
===
sessionId
)
return
`
###
${
sub
.
focus_area
}
\n\n
`
+
domainTasks
.
map
(
t
=>
`
- **
${
t
.
id
}
**:
${
t
.
title
}
(
${
t
.
type
}
,
${
t
.
effort
}
)
${
t
.
depends_on
.
length
?
'← '
+
t
.
depends_on
.
join
(
', '
)
:
''
}
`
)
.
join
(
'\n'
)
}
)
.
join
(
'\n\n'
)
}
## 冲突报告
${
allConflicts
.
length
===
0
?
'✅ 无冲突检测到'
:
allConflicts
.
map
(
c
=>
`
- **
${
c
.
type
}
** (
${
c
.
severity
}
):
${
c
.
description
}
`
)
.
join
(
'\n'
)
}
## 执行
```bash
/workflow:unified-execute-with-file PLAN="
${
sessionFolder
}
/.task/"
```
Session artifacts: `
${
sessionFolder
}
/`
`
Write
(
`
${
sessionFolder
}
/plan.md
`
,
planMd
)
Step 4.4: Display Completion Summary
Present session statistics and next steps.
// Display:
// - Session ID and directory path
// - Total domains planned
// - Total tasks generated
// - Conflict status (count and severity)
// - Execution command for next step
if
(
!
autoMode
)
{
AskUserQuestion
(
{
questions
:
[
{
question
:
`
规划完成:\n-
${
subDomains
.
length
}
个子领域\n-
${
allTasks
.
length
}
个任务\n-
${
allConflicts
.
length
}
个冲突\n\n下一步:
`
,
header
:
"Next Step"
,
multiSelect
:
false
,
options
:
[
{
label
:
"Execute Plan"
,
description
:
"使用 unified-execute 执行计划"
}
,
{
label
:
"Review Conflicts"
,
description
:
"查看并解决冲突"
}
,
{
label
:
"Export"
,
description
:
"导出 plan.md"
}
,
{
label
:
"Done"
,
description
:
"保存产物,稍后执行"
}
]
}
]
}
)
}
Selection
Action
Execute Plan
Skill(skill="workflow:unified-execute-with-file", args="PLAN=\"${sessionFolder}/.task/\"")
Review Conflicts
Display conflicts.json content for manual resolution
Export
Copy plan.md + plan-note.md to user-specified location
Done
Display artifact paths, end workflow
Step 4.5: Sync Session State
$session
-sync
-y
"Plan complete: {domains} domains, {tasks} tasks"
Updates specs/*.md with planning insights and project-tech.json with planning session entry.
Success Criteria
:
plan.md
generated with complete summary
.task/TASK-*.json
collected at session root (consumable by unified-execute)
All artifacts present in session directory
Session state synced via
$session-sync
User informed of completion and next steps
Configuration
Flag
Default
Description
--max-domains
5
Maximum sub-domains to identify
-y, --yes
false
Auto-confirm all decisions
Iteration Patterns
New Planning Session
User initiates: TASK="task description"
├─ No session exists → New session mode
├─ Analyze task with inline search tools
├─ Identify sub-domains
├─ Create plan-note.md template
├─ Generate requirement-analysis.json
├─ Serial domain planning:
│ ├─ Domain 1: explore → .task/TASK-*.json → fill plan-note.md
│ ├─ Domain 2: explore → .task/TASK-*.json → fill plan-note.md
│ └─ Domain N: ...
├─ Collect domain .task/*.json → session .task/
├─ Verify plan-note.md consistency
├─ Detect conflicts
├─ Generate plan.md summary
└─ Report completion
Continue Existing Session
User resumes: TASK="same task"
├─ Session exists → Continue mode
├─ Load plan-note.md and requirement-analysis.json
├─ Identify incomplete domains (empty task pool sections)
├─ Plan remaining domains serially
└─ Continue with conflict detection
Error Handling & Recovery
Situation
Action
Recovery
No codebase detected
Normal flow, pure requirement planning
Proceed without codebase context
Codebase search fails
Continue with available context
Note limitation in plan-note.md
Domain planning fails
Record error, continue with next domain
Retry failed domain or plan manually
Section not found in plan-note
Create section defensively
Continue with new section
No tasks generated for a domain
Review domain description
Refine scope and retry
Conflict detection fails
Continue with empty conflicts
Note in completion summary
Session folder conflict
Append timestamp suffix
Create unique folder
plan-note.md format inconsistency
Validate and fix format after each domain
Re-read and normalize
Best Practices
Before Starting Planning
Clear Task Description
: Detailed requirements lead to better sub-domain splitting
Reference Documentation
: Ensure latest README and design docs are identified during Phase 1
Clarify Ambiguities
: Resolve unclear requirements before committing to sub-domains
During Planning
Review Plan Note
: Check plan-note.md between domains to verify progress
Verify Independence
: Ensure sub-domains are truly independent and have minimal overlap
Check Dependencies
: Cross-domain dependencies should be documented explicitly
Inspect Details
: Review
domains/{domain}/.task/TASK-*.json
for specifics when needed
Consistent Format
: Follow task summary format strictly across all domains
TASK ID Isolation
: Use pre-assigned non-overlapping ranges to prevent ID conflicts
After Planning
Resolve Conflicts
: Address high/critical conflicts before execution
Review Summary
: Check plan.md for completeness and accuracy
Validate Tasks
: Ensure all tasks have clear scope and modification targets
When to Use
Use collaborative-plan-with-file when:
A complex task spans multiple sub-domains (backend + frontend + database, etc.)
Need structured multi-domain task breakdown with conflict detection
Planning a feature that touches many parts of the codebase
Want pre-allocated section organization for clear domain separation
Use lite-plan when:
Single domain, clear task with no sub-domain splitting needed
Quick planning without conflict detection
Use req-plan-with-file when:
Requirement-level progressive roadmap needed (MVP → iterations)
Higher-level decomposition before detailed planning
Use analyze-with-file when:
Need in-depth analysis before planning
Understanding and discussion, not task generation
Now execute collaborative-plan-with-file for
: $ARGUMENTS
返回排行榜