idor vulnerability testing

安装量: 42
排名: #17429

安装

npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill 'IDOR Vulnerability Testing'
IDOR Vulnerability Testing
Purpose
Provide systematic methodologies for identifying and exploiting Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in web applications. This skill covers both database object references and static file references, detection techniques using parameter manipulation and enumeration, exploitation via Burp Suite, and remediation strategies for securing applications against unauthorized access.
Inputs / Prerequisites
Target Web Application
URL of application with user-specific resources
Multiple User Accounts
At least two test accounts to verify cross-user access
Burp Suite or Proxy Tool
Intercepting proxy for request manipulation
Authorization
Written permission for security testing
Understanding of Application Flow
Knowledge of how objects are referenced (IDs, filenames)
Outputs / Deliverables
IDOR Vulnerability Report
Documentation of discovered access control bypasses
Proof of Concept
Evidence of unauthorized data access across user contexts
Affected Endpoints
List of vulnerable API endpoints and parameters
Impact Assessment
Classification of data exposure severity
Remediation Recommendations
Specific fixes for identified vulnerabilities Core Workflow 1. Understand IDOR Vulnerability Types Direct Reference to Database Objects Occurs when applications reference database records via user-controllable parameters:

Original URL (authenticated as User A)

example.com/user/profile?id=2023

Manipulation attempt (accessing User B's data)

example.com/user/profile?id=2022 Direct Reference to Static Files Occurs when applications expose file paths or names that can be enumerated:

Original URL (User A's receipt)

example.com/static/receipt/205.pdf

Manipulation attempt (User B's receipt)

example.com/static/receipt/200.pdf 2. Reconnaissance and Setup Create Multiple Test Accounts Account 1: "attacker" - Primary testing account Account 2: "victim" - Account whose data we attempt to access Identify Object References Capture and analyze requests containing: Numeric IDs in URLs: /api/user/123 Numeric IDs in parameters: ?id=123&action=view Numeric IDs in request body: {"userId": 123} File paths: /download/receipt_123.pdf GUIDs/UUIDs: /profile/a1b2c3d4-e5f6-... Map User IDs

Access user ID endpoint (if available)

GET /api/user-id/

Note ID patterns:

- Sequential integers (1, 2, 3...)

- Auto-incremented values

- Predictable patterns

  1. Detection Techniques URL Parameter Manipulation

Step 1: Capture original authenticated request

GET /api/user/profile?id=1001 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: session=attacker_session

Step 2: Modify ID to target another user

GET /api/user/profile?id=1000 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: session=attacker_session

Vulnerable if: Returns victim's data with attacker's session

Request Body Manipulation

Original POST request

POST /api/address/update HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json Cookie: session=attacker_session

Modified request targeting victim

{"id": 5, "userId": 1000, "address": "123 Attacker St"} HTTP Method Switching

Original GET request may be protected

GET /api/admin/users/1000 → 403 Forbidden

Try alternative methods

POST /api/admin/users/1000 → 200 OK (Vulnerable!) PUT /api/admin/users/1000 → 200 OK (Vulnerable!) 4. Exploitation with Burp Suite Manual Exploitation 1. Configure browser proxy through Burp Suite 2. Login as "attacker" user 3. Navigate to profile/data page 4. Enable Intercept in Proxy tab 5. Capture request with user ID 6. Modify ID to victim's ID 7. Forward request 8. Observe response for victim's data Automated Enumeration with Intruder 1. Send request to Intruder (Ctrl+I) 2. Clear all payload positions 3. Select ID parameter as payload position 4. Configure attack type: Sniper 5. Payload settings: - Type: Numbers - Range: 1 to 10000 - Step: 1 6. Start attack 7. Analyze responses for 200 status codes Battering Ram Attack for Multiple Positions

When same ID appears in multiple locations

PUT /api/addresses/§5§/update HTTP/1.1 {"id": §5§, "userId": 3} Attack Type: Battering Ram Payload: Numbers 1-1000 5. Common IDOR Locations API Endpoints /api/user/{id} /api/profile/{id} /api/order/{id} /api/invoice/{id} /api/document/{id} /api/message/{id} /api/address/{id}/update /api/address/{id}/delete File Downloads /download/invoice_{id}.pdf /static/receipts/{id}.pdf /uploads/documents/{filename} /files/reports/report_{date}_{id}.xlsx Query Parameters ?userId=123 ?orderId=456 ?documentId=789 ?file=report_123.pdf ?account=user@email.com Quick Reference IDOR Testing Checklist Test Method Indicator of Vulnerability Increment/Decrement ID Change id=5 to id=4 Returns different user's data Use Victim's ID Replace with known victim ID Access granted to victim's resources Enumerate Range Test IDs 1-1000 Find valid records of other users Negative Values Test id=-1 or id=0 Unexpected data or errors Large Values Test id=99999999 System information disclosure String IDs Change format id=user_123 Logic bypass GUID Manipulation Modify UUID portions Predictable UUID patterns Response Analysis Status Code Interpretation 200 OK Potential IDOR - verify data ownership 403 Forbidden Access control working 404 Not Found Resource doesn't exist 401 Unauthorized Authentication required 500 Error Potential input validation issue Common Vulnerable Parameters Parameter Type Examples User identifiers userId , uid , user_id , account Resource identifiers id , pid , docId , fileId Order/Transaction orderId , transactionId , invoiceId Message/Communication messageId , threadId , chatId File references filename , file , document , path Constraints and Limitations Operational Boundaries Requires at least two valid user accounts for verification Some applications use session-bound tokens instead of IDs GUID/UUID references harder to enumerate but not impossible Rate limiting may restrict enumeration attempts Some IDOR requires chained vulnerabilities to exploit Detection Challenges Horizontal privilege escalation (user-to-user) vs vertical (user-to-admin) Blind IDOR where response doesn't confirm access Time-based IDOR in asynchronous operations IDOR in websocket communications Legal Requirements Only test applications with explicit authorization Document all testing activities and findings Do not access, modify, or exfiltrate real user data Report findings through proper disclosure channels Examples Example 1: Basic ID Parameter IDOR

Login as attacker (userId=1001)

Navigate to profile page

Original request

GET /api/profile?id=1001 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: session=abc123

Response: Attacker's profile data

Modified request (targeting victim userId=1000)

GET /api/profile?id=1000 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: session=abc123

Vulnerable Response: Victim's profile data returned!

Example 2: IDOR in Address Update Endpoint

Intercept address update request

PUT /api/addresses/5/update HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json Cookie: session=attacker_session { "id": 5, "userId": 1001, "street": "123 Main St", "city": "Test City" }

Modify userId to victim's ID

{ "id": 5, "userId": 1000, # Changed from 1001 "street": "Hacked Address", "city": "Exploit City" }

If 200 OK: Address created under victim's account

Example 3: Static File IDOR

Download own receipt

GET /api/download/5 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: session=attacker_session

Response: PDF of attacker's receipt (order #5)

Attempt to access other receipts

GET /api/download/3 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: session=attacker_session

Vulnerable Response: PDF of victim's receipt (order #3)!

Example 4: Burp Intruder Enumeration

Configure Intruder attack

Target: PUT /api/addresses/§1§/update Payload Position: Address ID in URL and body Attack Configuration: - Type: Battering Ram - Payload: Numbers 0-20, Step 1 Body Template: { "id": §1§, "userId": 3 }

Analyze results:

- 200 responses indicate successful modification

- Check victim's account for new addresses

Example 5: Horizontal to Vertical Escalation

Step 1: Enumerate user roles

GET /api/user/1 → {"role": "user", "id": 1} GET /api/user/2 → {"role": "user", "id": 2} GET /api/user/3 → {"role": "admin", "id": 3}

Step 2: Access admin functions with discovered ID

GET /api/admin/dashboard?userId=3 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: session=regular_user_session

If accessible: Vertical privilege escalation achieved

Troubleshooting
Issue: All Requests Return 403 Forbidden
Cause
Server-side access control is implemented Solution :

Try alternative attack vectors:

  1. HTTP method switching (GET → POST → PUT)
  2. Add X-Original-URL or X-Rewrite-URL headers
  3. Try parameter pollution: ?id=1001&id=1000
  4. URL encoding variations: %31%30%30%30 for "1000"
  5. Case variations for string IDs
    Issue: Application Uses UUIDs Instead of Sequential IDs
    Cause
    Randomized identifiers reduce enumeration risk Solution :

UUID discovery techniques:

  1. Check response bodies for leaked UUIDs
  2. Search JavaScript files for hardcoded UUIDs
  3. Check API responses that list multiple objects
  4. Look for UUID patterns in error messages
  5. Try UUID v1 (time-based) prediction if applicable
    Issue: Session Token Bound to User
    Cause
    Application validates session against requested resource Solution :

Advanced bypass attempts:

  1. Test for IDOR in unauthenticated endpoints
  2. Check password reset/email verification flows
  3. Look for IDOR in file upload/download
  4. Test API versioning: /api/v1/ vs /api/v2/
  5. Check mobile API endpoints (often less protected)
    Issue: Rate Limiting Blocks Enumeration
    Cause
    Application implements request throttling Solution :

Bypass techniques:

  1. Add delays between requests (Burp Intruder throttle)
  2. Rotate IP addresses (proxy chains)
  3. Target specific high-value IDs instead of full range
  4. Use different endpoints for same resources
  5. Test during off-peak hours
    Issue: Cannot Verify IDOR Impact
    Cause
    Response doesn't clearly indicate data ownership Solution :

Verification methods:

  1. Create unique identifiable data in victim account
  2. Look for PII markers (name, email) in responses
  3. Compare response lengths between users
  4. Check for timing differences in responses
  5. Use secondary indicators (creation dates, metadata) Remediation Guidance Implement Proper Access Control

Django example - validate ownership

def update_address ( request , address_id ) : address = Address . objects . get ( id = address_id )

Verify ownership before allowing update

if address . user != request . user : return HttpResponseForbidden ( "Unauthorized" )

Proceed with update

address . update ( request . data ) Use Indirect References

Instead of: /api/address/123

Use: /api/address/current-user/billing

def get_address ( request ) :

Always filter by authenticated user

address

Address . objects . filter ( user = request . user ) . first ( ) return address Server-Side Validation

Always validate on server, never trust client input

def download_receipt ( request , receipt_id ) : receipt = Receipt . objects . filter ( id = receipt_id , user = request . user

Critical: filter by current user

) . first ( ) if not receipt : return HttpResponseNotFound ( ) return FileResponse ( receipt . file )

返回排行榜