consulting-analysis

安装量: 315
排名: #2928

安装

npx skills add https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow --skill consulting-analysis
Professional Research Report Skill
Overview
This skill produces professional, consulting-grade research reports in Markdown format, covering domains such as
market analysis, consumer insights, brand strategy, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment research, and macroeconomic analysis
. It operates across two distinct phases:
Phase 1 — Analysis Framework Generation
Given a research subject, produce a rigorous analysis framework including chapter skeleton, per-chapter data requirements, analysis logic, and visualization plan.
Phase 2 — Report Generation
After data has been collected by other skills, synthesize all inputs into a final polished report.
The output adheres to McKinsey/BCG consulting voice standards. The report language follows the
output_locale
setting (default:
zh_CN
for Chinese).
Data Authenticity Protocol
Strict Adherence Rule
All data presented in the report and visualized in charts MUST be derived directly from the provided
Data Summary
or
External Search Findings
.
NO Hallucinations
Do not invent, estimate, or simulate data. If data is missing, state "Data not available" rather than fabricating numbers.
Traceable Sources
Every major claim and chart must be traceable back to the input data package.
Core Capabilities
Design analysis frameworks
from scratch given only a research subject and scope
Transform raw data into structured, high-depth research reports
Follow the
"Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis"
flow per sub-chapter
Produce insights following the
"Data → User Psychology → Strategy Implication"
chain
Embed pre-generated charts and construct comparison tables
Generate inline citations formatted per
GB/T 7714-2015
standards
Output reports in the language specified by
output_locale
with professional consulting tone
Adapt analytical depth and structure to domain (marketing, finance, industry, etc.)
When to Use This Skill
Always load this skill when:
User asks for a market analysis, consumer insight report, financial analysis, industry research, or any consulting-grade analytical report
User provides a research subject and needs a structured analysis framework before data collection
User provides data summaries, analysis frameworks, or chart files to be synthesized into a report
User needs a professional consulting-style research report
The task involves transforming research findings into structured strategic narratives
Phase 1: Analysis Framework Generation
Purpose
Given a
research subject
(e.g., "Gen-Z Skincare Market Analysis", "NEV Industry Competitive Landscape", "Brand X Consumer Profiling"), produce a complete
analysis framework
that serves as the blueprint for downstream data collection and final report generation.
Phase 1 Inputs
Input
Description
Required
Research Subject
The topic or question to be analyzed
Yes
Scope / Constraints
Geographic scope, time range, industry segment, target audience, etc.
Optional
Specific Angles
Any particular angles or hypotheses the user wants explored
Optional
Domain
The analytical domain: market, finance, industry, brand, consumer, investment, etc.
Inferred
Phase 1 Workflow
Step 1.1: Understand the Research Subject
Parse the research subject to identify the
core entity
(market, brand, product, industry, consumer segment, financial instrument, etc.)
Identify the
analytical domain
(marketing, finance, industry, competitive, consumer, investment, macro, etc.)
Determine the
natural analytical dimensions
based on domain:
Domain
Typical Dimensions
Market Analysis
Market size, growth trends, market segmentation, growth drivers, competitive landscape, consumer profiling
Brand Analysis
Brand positioning, market share, consumer perception, marketing strategy, competitor comparison
Consumer Insights
Demographic profiling, purchase behavior, decision journey, pain points, scenario analysis
Financial Analysis
Macro environment, industry trends, company fundamentals, financial metrics, valuation, risk assessment
Industry Research
Value chain analysis, market size, competitive landscape, policy environment, technology trends, entry barriers
Investment Due Diligence
Business model, financial health, management assessment, market opportunity, risk factors, exit pathways
Competitive Intelligence
Competitor identification, strategic comparison, SWOT analysis, differentiated positioning, market dynamics
Step 1.2: Select Analysis Frameworks & Models
Based on the identified domain and research subject, select
one or more
professional analysis frameworks to structure the reasoning in each chapter. The chosen frameworks guide the
Analysis Logic
in the chapter skeleton (Step 1.3).
Strategic & Environmental Analysis
Framework
Description
Best For
SWOT Analysis
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Brand assessment, competitive positioning, strategic planning
PEST / PESTEL Analysis
Political, Economic, Social, Technological (+ Environmental, Legal)
Macro-environment scanning, market entry assessment, policy impact analysis
Porter's Five Forces
Supplier bargaining power, buyer bargaining power, threat of new entrants, threat of substitutes, industry rivalry
Industry competitive landscape, entry barrier assessment, profit margin analysis
Porter's Diamond Model
Factor conditions, demand conditions, related industries, firm strategy & structure
National/regional competitive advantage analysis
VRIO Analysis
Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization
Core competency assessment, resource advantage analysis
Market & Growth Analysis
Framework
Description
Best For
STP Analysis
Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning
Market segmentation, target market selection, brand positioning
BCG Matrix (Growth-Share Matrix)
Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs
Product portfolio management, resource allocation decisions
Ansoff Matrix
Market penetration, market development, product development, diversification
Growth strategy selection
Product Life Cycle (PLC)
Introduction, growth, maturity, decline
Product strategy formulation, market timing decisions
TAM-SAM-SOM
Total / Serviceable / Obtainable Market
Market sizing, opportunity quantification
Technology Adoption Lifecycle
Innovators → Early Adopters → Early Majority → Late Majority → Laggards
Emerging technology/category penetration analysis
Consumer & Behavioral Analysis
Framework
Description
Best For
Consumer Decision Journey
Awareness → Consideration → Evaluation → Purchase → Loyalty
Consumer behavior path mapping, touchpoint optimization
AARRR Funnel (Pirate Metrics)
Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Revenue, Referral
User growth analysis, conversion rate optimization
RFM Model
Recency, Frequency, Monetary
Customer value segmentation, precision marketing
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
Physiological → Safety → Social → Esteem → Self-actualization
Consumer psychology analysis, product value proposition
Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD)
The "job" a user needs to accomplish in a specific context
Demand insight, product innovation direction
Financial & Valuation Analysis
Framework
Description
Best For
DuPont Analysis
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
Profitability decomposition, financial health diagnosis
DCF (Discounted Cash Flow)
Free cash flow discounting
Enterprise/project valuation
Comparable Company Analysis
PE, PB, PS, EV/EBITDA multiples comparison
Relative valuation, peer benchmarking
EVA (Economic Value Added)
After-tax operating profit - Cost of capital
Value creation capability assessment
Competitive & Strategic Positioning
Framework
Description
Best For
Benchmarking
Key performance indicator item-by-item comparison
Competitor gap analysis, best practice identification
Strategic Group Mapping
Cluster competitors along two key dimensions
Competitive landscape visualization, white-space identification
Value Chain Analysis
Primary activities + support activities value decomposition
Cost advantage sources, differentiation opportunity identification
Blue Ocean Strategy
Value curve, four-action framework (Eliminate-Reduce-Raise-Create)
Differentiated innovation, new market space creation
Perceptual Mapping
Plot brand positions along two consumer-perceived dimensions
Brand positioning analysis, market gap discovery
Industry & Supply Chain Analysis
Framework
Description
Best For
Industry Value Chain
Upstream → Midstream → Downstream decomposition
Industry structure understanding, profit distribution analysis
Gartner Hype Cycle
Technology Trigger → Peak of Inflated Expectations → Trough of Disillusionment → Slope of Enlightenment → Plateau of Productivity
Emerging technology maturity assessment
GE-McKinsey Matrix
Industry Attractiveness × Competitive Strength
Business portfolio prioritization, investment decisions
Selection Principles
Domain-First
Based on the domain identified in Step 1.1, select
2-4
most relevant frameworks from the toolkit above
Complementary
Choose complementary rather than overlapping frameworks (e.g., macro-level with PESTEL + micro-level with Porter's Five Forces)
Depth over Breadth
Better to deeply apply 2 frameworks than superficially stack 6
Data-Feasible
Selected frameworks must be supportable by downstream data collection skills — if the data required by a framework cannot be reasonably obtained, downgrade or substitute
Explicit Mapping
In the chapter skeleton, explicitly annotate which framework each chapter uses and how it is applied Framework Selection Output Format

Framework Selection | Chapter | Selected Framework(s) | Application | |


|

|

| | Market Size & Growth Trends | TAM-SAM-SOM + Product Life Cycle | TAM-SAM-SOM to quantify market space, PLC to determine market stage | | Competitive Landscape Assessment | Porter's Five Forces + Strategic Group Mapping | Five Forces to assess industry competition intensity, Group Mapping to visualize competitive positioning | | Consumer Profiling | RFM + Consumer Decision Journey | RFM to segment customer value, Decision Journey to identify key conversion nodes | | Brand Strategy Recommendations | SWOT + Blue Ocean Strategy | SWOT to summarize overall landscape, Blue Ocean to guide differentiation direction | Step 1.3: Design Chapter Skeleton Produce a hierarchical chapter structure. Each chapter must include: Chapter Title — Professional, concise, subject-based (follow titling constraints in Formatting section) Analysis Objective — What this chapter aims to reveal Analysis Logic — The reasoning chain or framework (must reference the frameworks selected in Step 1.2) Core Hypothesis — Preliminary hypotheses to be validated or refuted by data Chapter Skeleton Output Format

Analysis Framework

Chapter 1: [Title]

**
Analysis Objective
**

[This chapter aims to...]

**
Analysis Logic
**

[Framework or reasoning chain used]

**
Core Hypothesis
**

[Hypotheses to validate]

**
Data Requirements
**

(see Step 1.4)

**
Visualization Plan
**
(see Step 1.5)

Chapter 2: [Title] ... Step 1.4: Define Data Query Requirements Per Chapter For each chapter, specify exactly what data needs to be collected . This is the bridge to downstream data collection skills. Each data requirement entry must include: Field Description Data Metric The specific metric or data point needed (e.g., "China skincare market size 2020-2025 (in billion CNY)") Data Type Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Suggested Sources Suggested source categories: Industry reports, financial statements, government statistics, social media, e-commerce platforms, survey data, news Search Keywords Suggested search queries for data collection agents Priority P0 (Required) / P1 (Important) / P2 (Supplementary) Time Range The time period the data should cover Data Requirements Output Format (per chapter)

Data Requirements |

| Data Metric | Data Type | Suggested Sources | Search Keywords | Priority | Time Range | |


|

|

|

|

|

|

| | 1 | Market size (billion CNY) | Quantitative | Industry reports, government statistics | "China skincare market size 2024" | P0 | 2020-2025 | | 2 | CAGR | Quantitative | Industry reports | "skincare CAGR growth rate" | P0 | 2020-2025 | | 3 | Sub-category share | Quantitative | E-commerce platforms, industry reports | "skincare category share cream serum sunscreen" | P1 | Latest | | 4 | Policy & regulatory updates | Qualitative | Government announcements, news | "cosmetics regulation 2024" | P2 | Past 1 year | Step 1.5: Define Visualization & Content Structure Per Chapter For each chapter, specify the planned visualization and content structure for the final report: Field Description Visualization Type Chart type: Line chart, bar chart, pie chart, scatter plot, radar chart, heatmap, Sankey diagram, comparison table, etc. Visualization Title Descriptive title for the chart Visualization Data Mapping Which data indicators map to X/Y axes or segments Comparison Table Design Column headers and comparison dimensions for the data contrast table Argument Structure The planned "What → Why → So What" narrative outline Visualization Plan Output Format (per chapter)

Visualization & Content Plan
**
Chart 1
**

[Type] — [Title]

X-axis: [Dimension], Y-axis: [Metric]

Data source: Corresponds to Data Requirement #1, #2 ** Comparison Table ** : | Dimension | Item A | Item B | Item C | |

|

|

|

|
**
Argument Structure
**
:
1.
**
Observation (What)
**
[Surface phenomenon revealed by data]
2.
**
Attribution (Why)
**
[Driving factors or underlying causes]
3.
**
Implication (So What)
**
[Strategic implications or recommended actions] Step 1.6: Output Complete Analysis Framework Assemble all outputs into a single, structured Analysis Framework Document :

[Research Subject] Analysis Framework

Research Overview

**
Research Subject
**

[...]

**
Scope
**

[Geography, time range, industry segment]

**
Analysis Domain
**

[Market / Finance / Industry / Brand / Consumer / ...]

**
Core Research Questions
**
[1-3 key questions]

Framework Selection | Chapter | Selected Framework(s) | Application | |


|

|

| | ... | ... | ... |

Chapter Skeleton

1. [Chapter Title]

**
Analysis Objective
**

[...]

**
Analysis Logic
**

[...]

**
Core Hypothesis
**
[...]

Data Requirements |

| Data Metric | Data Type | Suggested Sources | Search Keywords | Priority | Time Range | |


|

|

|

|

|

|

| | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

Visualization & Content Plan [Chart plan + Comparison table design + Argument structure]

  1. [Chapter Title] ...

N. [Chapter Title] ...

Data Collection Task List
[Consolidate all P0/P1 data requirements across chapters into a structured task list for downstream data collection skills to execute]
Phase 1 Quality Checklist
Analysis framework covers all natural dimensions for the identified domain
2-4 professional analysis frameworks are selected and explicitly mapped to chapters
Selected frameworks are complementary (not overlapping) and data-feasible
Each chapter has clear Analysis Objective, Analysis Logic (referencing chosen framework), and Core Hypothesis
Data requirements are specific, measurable, and include search keywords
Every chapter has at least one visualization plan
Data priorities (P0/P1/P2) are assigned realistically
The framework is actionable — a data collection agent can execute on the Search Keywords directly
Data Collection Task List is comprehensive and deduplicated
Phase 1→2 Handoff: Data Collection & Chart Generation
After the analysis framework is generated, it is handed off to
other data collection skills
(e.g., deep-research, data-analysis, web search agents) to:
Execute the
Search Keywords
from each chapter's data requirements
Collect quantitative data, qualitative insights, and source URLs
Generate charts based on the
Visualization & Content Plan
Return a
Data Package
containing:
Data Summary
Raw numbers, metrics, and qualitative findings per chapter
Chart Files
Generated chart images with local file paths
External Search Findings
Source URLs and summaries for citations
This skill does NOT perform data collection.
It only produces the framework (Phase 1) and the final report (Phase 2).
Chart Generation
If a visualization/charting skill is available (e.g., data-analysis, image-generation), chart generation can be deferred to the beginning of Phase 2 — see Step 2.3.
Phase 2: Report Generation
Purpose
Receive the completed
Analysis Framework
and
Data Package
from upstream, and synthesize them into a final consulting-grade report.
Phase 2 Inputs
Input
Description
Required
Analysis Framework
The framework document produced in Phase 1
Yes
Data Summary
Collected data organized per chapter from the data collection phase
Yes
Chart Files
Local file paths for generated chart images. If not provided, will be generated in Step 2.3 using available visualization skills
Optional
External Search Findings
URLs and summaries for inline citations
Optional
Phase 2 Workflow
Step 2.1: Receive and Validate Inputs
Verify that all required inputs are present:
Analysis Framework
— Confirm it contains chapter skeleton, data requirements, and visualization plans
Data Summary
— Confirm it contains data organized per chapter, cross-reference against P0 requirements
Chart Files
— Confirm file paths are valid local paths
If any P0 data is missing, note it in the report and flag for the user.
Step 2.2: Map Report Structure
Map the final report structure from the Analysis Framework:
Abstract
— Executive summary with key takeaways
Introduction
— Background, objectives, methodology
Main Body Chapters (2...N)
— Mapped from the Framework's chapter skeleton
Conclusion
— Pure, objective synthesis
References
— GB/T 7714-2015 formatted references
Step 2.3: Generate Chapter Charts (Pre-Report Visualization)
Before writing the report, generate all planned charts from the Analysis Framework's
Visualization & Content Plan
. This step ensures every sub-chapter has its "Visual Anchor" ready before narrative writing begins.
When to Execute This Step
Chart Files already provided
Skip this step — proceed directly to Step 2.4.
Chart Files NOT provided but a visualization skill is available
Execute this step to generate all charts first.
No Chart Files and no visualization skill available
Skip this step — use comparison tables as the primary visual anchor in Step 2.4, and note the absence of charts.
Chart Generation Workflow
Extract Chart Tasks
Parse all Visualization & Content Plan entries from the Analysis Framework to build a chart generation task list:

Chapter
Chart Type
Chart Title
Data Mapping
Data Source
1
2.1
Line chart
Market Size Trend 2020-2025
X: Year, Y: Market Size (billion CNY)
Data Requirement #1, #2
2
3.1
Pie chart
Consumer Age Distribution
Segments: Age groups, Values: Share %
Data Requirement #5
...
...
...
...
...
...
Prepare Chart Data
For each chart task, extract the corresponding data points from the
Data Summary
.
CRITICAL
Use ONLY the numbers provided in the Data Summary. Do NOT invent or "smooth" data to make charts look better. If data points are missing, the chart must reflect that reality (e.g., broken line or missing bar), or the chart type must be adjusted.
Delegate to Visualization Skill
Invoke the available visualization/charting skill (e.g.,
data-analysis
) for each chart task with:
Chart type and title
Structured data
Axis labels and formatting preferences
Output file path convention:
charts/chapter_{N}_{chart_index}.png
Collect Chart File Paths
Record all generated chart file paths for embedding in Step 2.4:

Generated Charts |

| Chapter | Chart Title | File Path | |


|

|

|

|
|
1
|
2.1
|
Market Size Trend 2020-2025
|
charts/chapter_2_1.png
|
|
2
|
3.1
|
Consumer Age Distribution
|
charts/chapter_3_1.png
|
Validate
Confirm all P0-priority charts have been generated. If any chart generation fails, note it and fall back to comparison tables for that sub-chapter.
Principle
Complete ALL chart generation before starting report writing. This ensures a consistent visual narrative and avoids interleaving generation with writing.
Step 2.4: Write the Report
For each sub-chapter, follow the
"Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis"
flow:
Visual Evidence Block
Embed charts using
Image Description
— use the file paths collected in Step 2.3
Data Contrast Table
Create a Markdown comparison table for key metrics
Source Rule
Every number in the table must come from the Data Summary. No hallucinations.
Integrated Narrative Analysis
Write analytical text following "What → Why → So What"
Narrative Rule
Narrative must explain the
provided
data. Do not make claims unsupported by the inputs.
Each sub-chapter must end with a robust analytical paragraph (min. 200 words) that:
Synthesizes conflicting or reinforcing data points
Reveals the underlying user tension or opportunity
Optionally ends with a punchy "One-Liner Truth" in a blockquote (
>
)
Step 2.5: Final Structure Self-Check
Before outputting, confirm the report contains
all sections in order
:
Abstract → 1. Introduction → 2...N. Body Chapters → N+1. Conclusion → N+2. References
Additionally verify:
All charts generated in Step 2.3 are embedded in the correct sub-chapters
Chart file paths in
references are valid
Sub-chapters without charts have comparison tables as visual anchors
The report
MUST NOT
stop after the Conclusion — it
MUST
include References as the final section.
Formatting & Tone Standards
Consulting Voice
Tone
McKinsey/BCG — Authoritative, Objective, Professional
Language
All headings and content in the language specified by
output_locale
Number Formatting
Use English commas for thousands separators (
1,000
not
1,000
)
Data emphasis
:
Bold
important viewpoints and key numbers
Titling Constraints
Numbering
Use standard numbering (
1.
,
1.1
) directly followed by the title
Forbidden Prefixes
Do NOT use "Chapter", "Part", "Section" as prefixes
Allowed Tone Words
Analysis, Profiling, Overview, Insights, Assessment
Forbidden Words
"Decoding", "DNA", "Secrets", "Mindscape", "Solar System", "Unlocking"
Sub-Chapter Conclusions
Requirement
End each sub-chapter with a robust analytical paragraph (min. 200 words).
Narrative Flow
This paragraph must look like a natural continuation of the text. It must synthesize the section's findings into a strategic judgment.
Content Logic
:
Synthesize the conflicting or reinforcing data points above.
Reveal the
underlying
user tension or opportunity.
Key Insight:
Optional
Only if you have a concise, punchy "One-Liner Truth", place it at the very end using a
Blockquote
(
>
) to anchor the section.
Insight Depth (The "So What" Chain)
Every insight must connect
Data → User Psychology → Strategy Implication
:
❌ Bad: "Females are 60%. Strategy: Target females."
✅ Good: "Females constitute 60% with a high TGI of 180. This suggests
the purchase decision is driven by aesthetic and social validation
rather than pure utility. Consequently, media spend should pivot
towards visual-heavy platforms (e.g., RED/Instagram) to maximize CTR,
treating male audiences only as a secondary gift-giving segment."
References
Inline
Use markdown links for sources (e.g.
Source Title
) when using External Search Findings
References section
Formatted strictly per
GB/T 7714-2015
Markdown Rules
Immediate Start
Begin directly with

Report Title

— no introductory text
No Separators
Do NOT use horizontal rules (

) Report Structure Template

[Report Title]

Abstract [Executive summary with key takeaways]

  1. Introduction [Background, objectives, methodology]

  1. [Body Chapter Title]

2.1 [Sub-chapter Title] ! Chart Description | Metric | Brand A | Brand B | |


|

|

| | ... | ... | ... | [Integrated narrative analysis: What → Why → So What, min. 200 words]

[Optional: One-liner strategic truth]

2.2 [Sub-chapter Title] ...

N+1. Conclusion [Pure objective synthesis, NO bullet points, neutral tone] [Para 1: The fundamental nature of the group/market] [Para 2: Core tension or behavior pattern] [Final: One or two sentences stating the objective truth]

N+2. References [1] Author. Title[EB/OL]. URL, Date. [2] ... Complete Example Phase 1 Example: Framework Generation User provides: Research subject "Gen-Z Skincare Market Analysis" Phase 1 output (Analysis Framework):

Gen-Z Skincare Market Analysis Framework

Research Overview

**
Research Subject
**

Gen-Z Skincare Market Deep Analysis

**
Scope
**

China market, 2020-2025, consumers aged 18-27

**
Analysis Domain
**

Market Analysis + Consumer Insights

** Core Research Questions ** : 1. What is the size and growth momentum of the Gen-Z skincare market? 2. What is unique about Gen-Z consumer skincare behavior patterns? 3. How can brands effectively reach and convert Gen-Z consumers?

Chapter Skeleton

**
Analysis Objective
**

Quantify Gen-Z skincare market size and identify growth drivers

**
Analysis Logic
**

Total market → Segmentation → Growth rate → Driver decomposition

**
Core Hypothesis
**
Gen-Z is becoming the core engine of skincare consumption growth

Data Requirements |

| Data Metric | Data Type | Suggested Sources | Search Keywords | Priority | Time Range | |


|

|

|

|

|

|

| | 1 | China skincare market total size | Quantitative | Industry reports | "China skincare market size 2024 2025" | P0 | 2020-2025 | | 2 | Gen-Z skincare spending share | Quantitative | Industry reports, e-commerce platforms | "Gen-Z skincare spending share youth" | P0 | Latest |

Visualization & Content Plan
**
Chart 1
**
Line chart — China Skincare Market Size Trend 2020-2025 ** Argument Structure ** : 1. What: Quantified status of market size and Gen-Z share 2. Why: Consumption upgrade, ingredient-conscious consumers, social media driven 3. So What: Brands should prioritize building youth-oriented product lines

  1. Consumer Profiling & Behavioral Insights ...

Data Collection Task List [Consolidated P0/P1 tasks] Phase 2 Example: Report Generation After data collection, user provides: Analysis Framework + Data Summary with brand metrics + chart file paths. Phase 2 output (Final Report) follows this flow: Start with

Gen-Z Skincare Market Deep Analysis Report

Abstract — 3-5 key takeaways in executive summary form
Introduction — Market context, research scope, data sources
Market Size & Growth Trend Analysis — Embed trend charts, comparison tables, strategic narrative
Consumer Profiling & Behavioral Insights — Demographics, purchase drivers, "So What" analysis
Brand Competitive Landscape Assessment — Brand positioning, share analysis, competitive dynamics
Marketing Strategy & Channel Insights — Channel effectiveness, content strategy implications
Conclusion — Objective synthesis in flowing prose (no bullets)
References — GB/T 7714-2015 formatted list
Quality Checklists
Phase 1 Quality Checklist (Analysis Framework)
Framework covers all natural analytical dimensions for the identified domain
Each chapter has clear Analysis Objective, Analysis Logic, and Core Hypothesis
Data requirements are specific, measurable, and include actionable Search Keywords
Every chapter has at least one visualization plan with chart type and data mapping
Data priorities (P0/P1/P2) are assigned — P0 items are essential for core arguments
Data Collection Task List is comprehensive, deduplicated, and ready for downstream execution
Framework adapts to the correct domain (market/finance/industry/consumer/etc.)
Phase 2 Quality Checklist (Final Report)
NO HALLUCINATION
All numbers and charts are verified against the input Data Summary All planned charts generated before report writing (Step 2.3 completed first) All sections present in correct order (Abstract → Introduction → Body → Conclusion → References) Every sub-chapter follows "Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis" Every sub-chapter ends with a min. 200-word analytical paragraph All insights follow the "Data → User Psychology → Strategy Implication" chain All headings use proper numbering (no "Chapter/Part/Section" prefixes) Charts are embedded with Description syntax Numbers use English commas for thousands separators Inline references use markdown links where applicable References section follows GB/T 7714-2015 No horizontal rules (

) in the document Conclusion uses flowing prose — no bullet points Report starts directly with

title — no preamble
Missing P0 data is explicitly flagged in the report
Output Format
Phase 1
Output the complete Analysis Framework in
Markdown
format
Phase 2
Output the complete Report in
Markdown
format
Settings
output_locale = zh_CN # configurable per user request
reasoning_locale = en
Notes
This skill operates in
two phases
of a multi-step agentic workflow:
Phase 1
produces the analysis framework and data collection requirements
Data collection
is performed by other skills (deep-research, data-analysis, etc.)
Phase 2
receives the collected data and produces the final report
Dynamic titling:
Rewrite
topics from the Framework into professional, concise subject-based headers
The Conclusion section must contain
NO
detailed recommendations — those belong in the preceding body chapters
ZERO HALLUCINATION POLICY
Each statement, chart, and number in the report must be supported by data points from the input Data Summary. If data is missing, admit it.
Traceability
If requested, you must be able to point to the specific line in the Data Summary or External Search Findings that supports a claim. The framework should adapt its analytical dimensions and depth to the specific domain (financial analysis uses different frameworks than consumer insights) When the research subject is ambiguous, default to the broadest reasonable scope and note assumptions
返回排行榜