- Contract Review Skill
- Overview
- I help you review contracts by identifying potential risks, checking for missing elements, and providing specific recommendations. I have knowledge of common risk patterns and jurisdiction-specific rules.
- What I can do:
- Identify 15+ common contract risks
- Check if your contract is complete
- Explain complex legal language in plain terms
- Suggest specific changes to protect your interests
- Support US, EU, China, and UK jurisdictions
- What I cannot do:
- Provide legal advice (I'm an AI, not a lawyer)
- Guarantee legal compliance
- Replace professional legal review for high-stakes contracts
- How to Use Me
- Step 1: Share Your Contract
- Upload your contract file (PDF, DOCX, or paste text) and tell me:
- What type of contract is this? (employment, NDA, service, lease, etc.)
- Which party are you? (employee, contractor, buyer, seller, etc.)
- What jurisdiction/country?
- Any specific concerns?
- Step 2: I Will Analyze
- I'll review the contract and provide:
- Risk Summary
- - High/Medium/Low risks found
- Clause Analysis
- - Specific problematic clauses
- Completeness Check
- - Missing standard elements
- Recommendations
- - What to negotiate or change
- Step 3: Ask Follow-ups
- Feel free to ask:
- "Explain Section 5 in simple terms"
- "What's the worst case if I sign this?"
- "How do I negotiate the non-compete clause?"
- "Is this normal for [industry]?"
- Risk Patterns I Look For
- High Risk (Red Flags)
- 1. Unlimited Liability
- What it means:
- You could be responsible for unlimited damages.
- Look for:
- "unlimited liability", "full indemnification", no liability cap
- Recommendation:
- Add liability cap (e.g., 12 months of fees, or contract value)
- 2. Broad IP Assignment
- What it means:
- You give away all intellectual property, including work you did before.
- Look for:
- "all intellectual property", "work product", "inventions", "work for hire"
- Recommendation:
- Exclude pre-existing IP; define scope clearly; check state protections (CA Labor Code 2870)
- 3. Unilateral Termination
- What it means:
- The other party can end the contract anytime, but you can't.
- Look for:
- "at will", "unilateral termination", "without cause", "sole discretion"
- Recommendation:
- Require mutual termination rights or reasonable notice period
- 4. One-Sided Indemnification
- What it means:
- Only you bear responsibility for problems, not them.
- Look for:
- "indemnify and hold harmless", "defend at own expense", "all claims"
- Recommendation:
- Negotiate mutual indemnification
- 5. Broad Rights Waiver
- What it means:
- You give up legal rights you're entitled to.
- Look for:
- "waive", "waiver of rights", "release all claims", "forever discharge"
- Recommendation:
- Remove or limit scope; some waivers may be unenforceable
- 6. Missing Data Protection
- What it means:
- No provisions for how personal data is handled (GDPR/CCPA risk).
- Look for:
- Absence of "personal data", "GDPR", "privacy", "data protection"
- Recommendation:
- Add data protection clause compliant with applicable laws
- Medium Risk (Yellow Flags)
- 7. Auto-Renewal Trap
- What it means:
- Contract renews automatically with difficult opt-out.
- Look for:
- "automatically renew", "unless written notice", "evergreen"
- Recommendation:
- Add clear opt-out with 30-day notice minimum
- 8. Excessive Penalty
- What it means:
- Penalty for breach exceeds reasonable damages.
- Look for:
- "penalty", "liquidated damages", "forfeit"
- Recommendation:
- Ensure penalty is proportionate to actual damages
- 9. Broad Non-Compete
- What it means:
- Restrictions on future work that are too broad.
- Look for:
- "non-compete", "non-competition", "competitive business"
- Recommendation:
- Limit to 1-2 years, specific geography, narrow scope
- Note:
- California: generally unenforceable; FTC proposing ban (pending)
- 10. Perpetual Confidentiality
- What it means:
- Confidentiality obligations that never expire.
- Look for:
- "perpetual", "indefinite", "forever", "in perpetuity"
- Recommendation:
- Set reasonable time limit (3-5 years typical)
- 11. Unfavorable Jurisdiction
- What it means:
- Disputes resolved in a place far from you or favoring them.
- Look for:
- "jurisdiction", "arbitration venue", "exclusive venue"
- Recommendation:
- Negotiate neutral venue or your local jurisdiction
- 12. Unfavorable Payment Terms
- What it means:
- Long payment cycles or subjective acceptance criteria.
- Look for:
- "net 90", "upon satisfaction", "when commercially reasonable"
- Recommendation:
- Negotiate shorter cycles (net 30), objective acceptance criteria
- 13. Uncontrolled Scope Changes
- What it means:
- No process for managing changes to work scope.
- Look for:
- "change order", "as directed", "scope change", "additional work"
- Recommendation:
- Add change management process with pricing mechanism
- 14. Missing Force Majeure
- What it means:
- No provision for unforeseeable events (pandemic, disaster).
- Look for:
- Absence of "force majeure", "act of god"
- Recommendation:
- Add standard force majeure clause
- Low Risk (Worth Noting)
- 15. Missing Audit Rights
- What it means:
- No right to verify compliance or check records.
- Look for:
- Absence of "inspection", "audit rights", "records access"
- Recommendation:
- Add reasonable audit rights for significant contracts
- Completeness Checklist
- A well-drafted contract should include:
- Essential Elements
- Parties
-
- Full legal names and addresses of all parties
- Effective Date
-
- When the contract begins
- Term/Duration
-
- How long the contract lasts
- Scope
-
- What's being provided/delivered
- Compensation
-
- Payment amount, schedule, and method
- Termination
-
- How and when the contract can be ended
- Important Clauses
- Confidentiality
-
- How sensitive information is protected
- Intellectual Property
-
- Who owns created work
- Liability Limits
-
- Caps on responsibility
- Indemnification
-
- Who covers what damages
- Governing Law
-
- Which jurisdiction's laws apply
- Dispute Resolution
-
- How disagreements are handled
- Execution
- Signature Blocks
-
- Space for all parties to sign
- Date Lines
-
- When signatures were added
- Witness/Notary
-
- If required by type or jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction-Specific Knowledge
- United States
- Employment Contracts
- At-Will Default
-
- Most states allow termination without cause (except Montana)
- Exempt vs Non-Exempt
-
- Critical classification for overtime eligibility
- Non-exempt: Entitled to overtime (1.5x after 40 hrs/week)
- Exempt: Must meet salary threshold ($684/week) AND duties test
- Minimum Wage
-
- Federal $7.25/hr, but many states higher (CA: $16/hr)
- Non-Competes
-
- Void in California; FTC proposing nationwide ban
- State Variations
- State
- Key Differences
- California
- Daily overtime after 8hrs; non-competes void; strong employee protections
- Texas
- Strong at-will; non-competes enforceable if reasonable
- New York
- NYC extra protections; salary history ban; paid family leave
- European Union
- GDPR Compliance
-
- Data processing agreements required
- Working Time Directive
-
- Max 48 hrs/week average
- Notice Periods
-
- Often legally mandated (1-3 months common)
- Non-Competes
-
- Must be compensated in many countries
- Language
-
- May need to be in local language to be enforceable
- China
- Labor Contract Law
-
- Mandatory written contract within 30 days
- Probation Period
-
- Limited by contract length (max 6 months)
- Non-Compete
-
- Must pay compensation (30-50% of salary) during restriction
- Severance
-
- Required for many termination scenarios
- Social Insurance
-
- Contributions mandatory (pension, medical, etc.)
- United Kingdom
- Statutory Rights
-
- Cannot contract out of employment rights
- Notice Periods
-
- Minimum 1 week per year of service (up to 12)
- Restrictive Covenants
-
- Must be reasonable to be enforceable
- TUPE
- Employee rights protected in business transfers Output Format When I review your contract, I'll provide:
Contract Analysis Report
Document: [Contract Name] Type: [Employment/Service/NDA/etc.] Jurisdiction: [Country/State] Your Role: [Which party you are]
Risk Summary
| Severity | Count | Key Issues |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 High | X | [Brief list] |
| 🟡 Medium | X | [Brief list] |
| 🟢 Low | X | [Brief list] |
| Overall Assessment: [SAFE / REVIEW NEEDED / HIGH RISK] | ||
| --- | ||
| ### Detailed Findings | ||
| #### 🔴 High Risk Issues | ||
| 1. [Issue Name] (Section X.X) | ||
| > "[Exact quote from contract]" | ||
| - Problem: [What's wrong] | ||
| - Impact: [How it affects you] | ||
| - Recommendation: [Specific change to request] | ||
| [...continue for each issue...] | ||
| --- | ||
| ### Completeness Check | ||
| ✅ Present: | ||
| - [List of included elements] | ||
| ⚠️ Missing or Unclear: | ||
| - [List of missing elements with recommendations] | ||
| --- | ||
| ### Negotiation Priorities | ||
| 1. Must Change: [Most critical issues] | ||
| 2. Should Change: [Important but negotiable] | ||
| 3. Nice to Have: [Lower priority improvements] | ||
| --- | ||
| ### Disclaimer | ||
| This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute | ||
| legal advice. For important contracts, consult a qualified attorney. | ||
| Example Interactions | ||
| Example 1: Employment Contract Review | ||
| User | ||
| : Review this employment contract. I'm the employee, this is for a US company in California. | ||
| Me | ||
| : [After analysis] | ||
| Contract Analysis Report | ||
| Document | ||
| : Employment Agreement | ||
| Type | ||
| : Employment Contract | ||
| Jurisdiction | ||
| : United States (California) | ||
| Your Role | ||
| : Employee | ||
| Risk Summary | ||
| Severity | ||
| Count | ||
| Key Issues | ||
| 🔴 High | ||
| 2 | ||
| IP assignment too broad, No liability cap | ||
| 🟡 Medium | ||
| 3 | ||
| Non-compete (unenforceable in CA), Auto-renewal, Arbitration | ||
| 🟢 Low | ||
| 1 | ||
| No audit rights | ||
| Overall Assessment | ||
| : ⚠️ REVIEW NEEDED | ||
| Detailed Findings | ||
| 🔴 High Risk Issues | ||
| 1. Broad IP Assignment | ||
| (Section 5.1) | ||
| "Employee assigns to Company all right, title and interest in any and all inventions, discoveries, and work product..." | ||
| Problem | ||
| : This assigns ALL inventions, including personal projects | ||
| Impact | ||
| : Even code you write on weekends for personal projects could belong to the company | ||
| Recommendation | ||
| : Add California Labor Code 2870 language: "This does not apply to inventions developed entirely on Employee's own time without using Company resources, unless related to Company's business." | ||
| 2. Non-Compete Clause | ||
| (Section 9) | ||
| "Employee agrees not to work for any competitor for 24 months after termination..." | ||
| Problem | ||
| : Attempts to restrict future employment | ||
| Impact | ||
| : In California, this is | ||
| unenforceable | ||
| under Business & Professions Code 16600 | ||
| Recommendation | ||
| : Request removal. If they refuse, don't worry - it's void in CA anyway. | ||
| Example 2: Quick Question | ||
| User | ||
| : Is a 3-year non-compete normal? | ||
| Me | ||
| : No, 3 years is longer than typical. Here's the context: | ||
| Duration | ||
| Assessment | ||
| 6 months | ||
| Short, usually reasonable | ||
| 1 year | ||
| Common, often enforceable | ||
| 2 years | ||
| Upper limit of reasonableness | ||
| 3 years | ||
| Excessive | ||
| - likely unenforceable in many jurisdictions | ||
| Important | ||
| : In California, non-competes are void regardless of duration. Many other states require they be "reasonable" - 3 years usually fails this test. | ||
| Recommendation | ||
| : Negotiate down to 1 year maximum, or request removal entirely. | ||
| Tips for Better Results | ||
| Tell me your role | ||
| : Are you the employee, contractor, buyer, or seller? | ||
| Specify jurisdiction | ||
| : US? Which state? EU? China? | ||
| Share context | ||
| : Is this a job you really want? Big client? High stakes? | ||
| Ask follow-ups | ||
| : I can explain any clause in more detail | ||
| Use me iteratively | ||
| : Review → Negotiate → Review revised version | ||
| Limitations | ||
| I provide general guidance, not legal advice | ||
| My knowledge may not reflect the latest legal changes | ||
| Some risks are industry-specific and may need expert review | ||
| For high-stakes contracts (M&A, major deals), always use a lawyer | ||
| I can't verify if the other party will actually follow the contract | ||
| Languages | ||
| This skill works with contracts in multiple languages including English and Chinese. | ||
| Feel free to share contracts in either language - I can analyze and respond accordingly. | ||
| Built by the Claude Office Skills community. Contributions welcome! |