ln-612-semantic-content-auditor

安装量: 75
排名: #10361

安装

npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-612-semantic-content-auditor

Paths: File paths ( shared/ , references/ , ../ln-* ) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. Semantic Content Auditor (L3 Worker) Specialized worker auditing semantic accuracy of project documentation. Purpose & Scope Worker in ln-610 coordinator pipeline - invoked by ln-610-docs-auditor for each project document Verify document content matches stated SCOPE (document purpose) Check content aligns with project goals (value contribution) Return structured findings to coordinator with severity, location, fix suggestions Does NOT verify facts against codebase Target Documents Called ONLY for project documents (not reference/tasks): Document Verification Focus CLAUDE.md Instructions serve stated purpose, no off-topic content docs/README.md Navigation scope correct, descriptions relevant docs/documentation_standards.md Standards applicable to this project type docs/principles.md Principles relevant to project architecture docs/project/requirements.md Requirements scope complete, no stale items docs/project/architecture.md Architecture scope covers all layers docs/project/tech_stack.md Stack scope matches project reality docs/project/api_spec.md API scope covers all endpoint groups docs/project/database_schema.md Schema scope covers all entities docs/project/design_guidelines.md Design scope covers active components docs/project/runbook.md Runbook scope covers setup + operations Excluded: docs/tasks/ , docs/reference/ , docs/presentation/ , tests/ Inputs (from Coordinator) MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md . Receives from coordinator per invocation: Field Description doc_path Path to document to audit (e.g., docs/project/architecture.md ) output_dir Directory for report output (from contextStore) project_root Project root path tech_stack Detected technology stack Workflow Phase 1: SCOPE EXTRACTION Read document first 20 lines Parse

comment If no SCOPE tag, infer from document type (see Verification Rules) Record stated purpose/boundaries Phase 2: CONTENT-SCOPE ALIGNMENT Analyze document sections against stated scope: Check Finding Type Section not serving scope OFF_TOPIC Scope aspect not covered MISSING_COVERAGE Excessive detail beyond scope SCOPE_CREEP Content duplicated elsewhere SSOT_VIOLATION Scoring: 10/10: All content serves scope, scope fully covered 8-9/10: Minor off-topic content or small gaps 6-7/10: Some sections not aligned, partial coverage 4-5/10: Significant misalignment, major gaps 1-3/10: Document does not serve its stated purpose Phase 3: SCORING & REPORT Calculate final score based on scope alignment: overall_score = weighted_average(coverage, relevance, focus) Coverage: how completely the scope is addressed. Relevance: how much content serves the scope. Focus: absence of off-topic content. Scoring Algorithm MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md . Output Format MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md . Write report to {output_dir}/612-semantic-{doc-slug}.md where doc-slug is derived from document filename (e.g., architecture , tech_stack , claude_md ). With category: "Semantic Content" and checks: scope_alignment. Return summary to coordinator: Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-610/{YYYY-MM-DD}/612-semantic-architecture.md Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N) Critical Rules MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md . Read before judge: Always read full document before reporting issues Scope inference: If no SCOPE tag, use document filename to infer expected scope No false positives: Better to miss an issue than report incorrectly Location precision: Always include line number for findings Actionable fixes: Every finding must have concrete fix suggestion No fact-checking: Do NOT verify paths, versions, endpoints against code Definition of Done MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md . Document read completely SCOPE extracted or inferred Content-scope alignment analyzed (OFF_TOPIC, MISSING_COVERAGE, SCOPE_CREEP, SSOT_VIOLATION) Score calculated using penalty algorithm Report written to {output_dir}/612-semantic-{doc-slug}.md (atomic single Write call) Summary returned to coordinator Reference Files Audit output schema: shared/references/audit_output_schema.md Version: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-01

返回排行榜