paper-context-resolver

paper-context-resolver When to apply README and repo files leave a reproduction-critical gap. The gap concerns dataset version, split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumptions. The main skill needs a narrow evidence supplement instead of a full paper summary. There is already a concrete reproduction question to answer. When not to apply The README already gives enough reproduction detail. The user wants a general paper explanation rather than reproduction support. The goal is to override README instructions without documenting the conflict. The only available input is a paper title and there is no concrete reproduction gap yet. Clear boundaries This skill is optional. This skill is helper-tier and should usually be orchestrator-invoked. It supplements README-first reproduction. It does not replace the main orchestration flow. It does not summarize the whole paper by default. Input expectations target repo metadata reproduction-critical question existing README or repo evidence any already known paper links Output expectations narrowed source list reproduction-relevant answer only explicit README-paper conflict note when applicable clear distinction between direct evidence and inference Notes Use references/paper-assisted-reproduction.md .