Claim–Evidence Matrix
Make the survey’s claims explicit and auditable before writing prose.
This should stay bullets-only (NO PROSE). The goal is to make later writing easy and to prevent “template prose” from sneaking in.
Inputs outline/outline.yml papers/paper_notes.jsonl Optional: outline/mapping.tsv Output outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md Workflow (heuristic)
Uses: outline/outline.yml, outline/mapping.tsv.
For each subsection, write 1–3 claims that are:
specific (mechanism / assumption / empirical finding)
falsifiable (“X reduces tool errors under Y evaluation”, not “X is important”)
For each claim, list ≥2 evidence sources:
prefer different styles of evidence (method paper + eval/benchmark paper, or two competing approaches)
Keep it tight: claim → evidence → (optional) caveat/limitations.
If evidence is weak or only abstract-level, say so explicitly (don’t overclaim).
If bibkey exists in papers/paper_notes.jsonl, include [@BibKey] next to evidence items to make later prose/LaTeX conversion smoother.
Quality checklist
Every subsection has ≥1 claim.
Each claim lists ≥2 evidence sources (or an explicit exception).
Claims are not copy-pasted templates (avoid “围绕…总结…” boilerplate).
Helper script (optional)
Quick Start
python .codex/skills/claim-evidence-matrix/scripts/run.py --help
python .codex/skills/claim-evidence-matrix/scripts/run.py --workspace
Fix:
Tighten each claim to a falsifiable statement and add an explicit caveat if evidence is abstract-only. Issue: you cannot add [@BibKey] because keys are missing
Fix:
Run citation-verifier to generate citations/ref.bib, then use the produced keys in the matrix.