curriculum-design

安装量: 42
排名: #17144

安装

npx skills add https://github.com/pauljbernard/content --skill curriculum-design

Learning Objectives & Curriculum Architecture Design

Create measurable learning objectives aligned to Bloom's Taxonomy and design comprehensive curriculum architecture for systematic instruction.

When to Use

Automatically activate when the user:

Needs to write learning objectives for a topic Asks "create learning objectives for [topic]" Wants to design curriculum scope and sequence Requests "backwards design" or "curriculum architecture" Says "organize this content into units" Needs UDL-aligned curriculum structure Required Inputs Research Artifacts: Output from /curriculum.research (optional but recommended) Topic: Subject matter to design curriculum for Educational Level: K-5, 6-8, 9-12, undergraduate, graduate, or post-graduate Duration: Course length (e.g., "6 weeks", "1 semester", "1 year") Learning Goals (optional): High-level outcomes the user wants Workflow 1. Load Research Context

If available, read research report to understand:

Core concepts to cover Standards to align with Prerequisites students should have Recommended pedagogical approach 2. Write Learning Objectives

Create objectives following these principles:

Structure: [Audience] will [Measurable Verb] [What] [How/Context] [Criteria]

Example: "Students will analyze photosynthesis diagrams by identifying and labeling components with 80% accuracy"

Bloom's Taxonomy Verbs by Level:

Remember (K-5 emphasis): define, identify, list, name, recall, recognize, state Understand (K-8 emphasis): describe, explain, summarize, paraphrase, classify, compare Apply (6-12 emphasis): demonstrate, use, solve, implement, execute, carry out Analyze (9-12, undergrad): differentiate, organize, attribute, compare, contrast, deconstruct Evaluate (undergrad, grad): critique, judge, defend, justify, assess, appraise Create (grad, post-grad): design, construct, generate, produce, plan, compose

Level-Appropriate Cognitive Distribution:

K-5: 60% Remember/Understand, 30% Apply, 10% Analyze 6-8: 40% Remember/Understand, 40% Apply, 20% Analyze 9-12: 30% Understand/Apply, 40% Analyze, 30% Evaluate/Create Undergraduate: 20% Understand/Apply, 40% Analyze, 40% Evaluate/Create Graduate: 10% Analyze, 40% Evaluate, 50% Create Post-Graduate: 90% Create, 10% Evaluate

Objective Categories:

Content Objectives (Knowledge): What students will know Skill Objectives (Performance): What students will be able to do Affective Objectives (optional): Attitudes, values, dispositions 3. Organize by Scope & Sequence

Create hierarchical structure:

Course/Program ├── Unit 1: [Theme] │ ├── Lesson 1.1: [Topic] │ │ └── Learning Objectives (3-5) │ ├── Lesson 1.2: [Topic] │ │ └── Learning Objectives (3-5) │ └── Unit Assessment ├── Unit 2: [Theme] │ └── [Similar structure] └── Final Assessment

Sequencing Principles:

Simple → Complex Concrete → Abstract Known → Unknown Skills before application Concepts before analysis 4. Create Curriculum Architecture Document

Generate comprehensive design:

Curriculum Design: [TOPIC]

Educational Level: [Level] Duration: [Timeframe] Design Date: [Date] Based on Research: [Link to research artifact if available]

Course/Unit Overview

Purpose: [Why this curriculum exists, what gap it fills]

Big Ideas: [2-3 overarching concepts students will understand]

Essential Questions: [3-5 open-ended questions that frame the learning]

Standards Addressed: [List of relevant standards from research]

Learning Objectives

Unit 1: [Title] ([Duration])

Unit Goal: [What students will accomplish by end of unit]

Learning Objectives:

  1. LO-1.1 [Bloom's Level: Remember] - Students will [verb] [content] [context] [criteria]
  2. Standard: [Aligned standard code]
  3. Assessment: [How this will be assessed]

  4. LO-1.2 [Bloom's Level: Understand] - Students will [verb] [content] [context] [criteria]

  5. Standard: [Aligned standard code]
  6. Assessment: [How this will be assessed]

  7. LO-1.3 [Bloom's Level: Apply] - Students will [verb] [content] [context] [criteria]

  8. Standard: [Aligned standard code]
  9. Assessment: [How this will be assessed]

[Continue for all objectives in unit]

Unit 2: [Title] ([Duration])

[Same structure as Unit 1]

Curriculum Scope & Sequence

| Unit | Topics Covered | Learning Objectives | Duration | Prerequisites |

|------|----------------|---------------------|----------|---------------|

| 1 | [Topics list] | LO-1.1 through LO-1.5 | 2 weeks | [Skills needed] |

| 2 | [Topics list] | LO-2.1 through LO-2.4 | 2 weeks | Unit 1 complete |

| 3 | [Topics list] | LO-3.1 through LO-3.6 | 3 weeks | Units 1-2 complete |

Total Duration: [Sum of all units]

Prerequisite Map

[Prerequisite 1] ──┐ [Prerequisite 2] ──┼──> Unit 1 ──> Unit 2 ──> Unit 3 [Prerequisite 3] ──┘

Curriculum Flow Diagram

Week 1-2: Unit 1 (Foundation) ↓ Week 3-4: Unit 2 (Application) ↓ Week 5-6: Unit 3 (Integration) ↓ Week 7: Synthesis & Assessment

Assessment Overview

Assessment Type When What Objectives Assessed
Formative Checks Weekly Quick checks, exit tickets All objectives (ongoing)
Unit 1 Assessment Week 2 [Assessment type] LO-1.1 through LO-1.5
Unit 2 Assessment Week 4 [Assessment type] LO-2.1 through LO-2.4
Final Performance Task Week 7 [Authentic task] All course objectives

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Considerations

Multiple Means of Representation

  • [How content will be presented in varied formats]
  • [Visual, auditory, kinesthetic options]

Multiple Means of Engagement

  • [How students will be motivated and engaged]
  • [Choice, relevance, authenticity elements]

Multiple Means of Expression

  • [How students will demonstrate learning]
  • [Varied assessment formats, options for showing mastery]

Differentiation Strategy

For Advanced Learners: - [Extensions, enrichment, depth opportunities]

For Struggling Learners: - [Scaffolding, additional support, simplified options]

For English Language Learners: - [Language supports, visual aids, vocabulary work]

For Students with Disabilities: - [Accommodations, modifications, accessibility features]

Materials & Resources Needed

  • [Resource 1]: [Purpose and when used]
  • [Resource 2]: [Purpose and when used]
  • [Resource 3]: [Purpose and when used]

Pedagogical Approach

Primary Instructional Model: [e.g., Backwards Design, Inquiry-Based, Project-Based]

Teaching Strategies: - [Strategy 1]: [How and when used] - [Strategy 2]: [How and when used]

Engagement Tactics: - [Tactic 1]: [Description] - [Tactic 2]: [Description]

Pacing Guide

Week Unit/Lesson Topics Objectives Assessment
1 Unit 1, Lesson 1 [Topics] LO-1.1, LO-1.2 Formative
2 Unit 1, Lessons 2-3 [Topics] LO-1.3, LO-1.4, LO-1.5 Unit 1 Assessment
3 Unit 2, Lesson 1 [Topics] LO-2.1, LO-2.2 Formative
[Continue for all weeks]

Next Steps

  1. Use /curriculum.assess-design to create detailed assessment blueprints and rubrics
  2. Develop lesson plans with /curriculum.develop-content
  3. Create assessment items with /curriculum.develop-items

Artifact Metadata: - Artifact Type: Curriculum Design - Topic: [Topic] - Level: [Level] - Total Objectives: [Count] - Duration: [Timeframe] - Bloom's Distribution: [Percentage at each level] - Next Phase: Assessment Design

  1. Validate Objectives

Check each objective for:

✅ Measurable action verb (not "understand" alone, but "demonstrate understanding by...") ✅ Clear, specific content ✅ Observable/assessable outcome ✅ Appropriate Bloom's level for grade ✅ Aligned to standards (if provided) ✅ Realistic for timeframe 6. Output Format

Human-Readable (default):

Formatted markdown as shown Write to file: curriculum-artifacts/[topic]-design.md

JSON Format (use --format json):

{ "artifact_type": "curriculum_design", "topic": "string", "level": "string", "duration": "string", "units": [ { "unit_number": 1, "title": "string", "duration": "string", "learning_objectives": [ { "id": "LO-1.1", "blooms_level": "Remember", "objective": "full text", "standard": "standard code", "assessment_type": "string" } ] } ], "bloom_distribution": { "remember": 20, "understand": 25, "apply": 30, "analyze": 15, "evaluate": 5, "create": 5 } }

  1. CLI Interface

With research artifact

/curriculum.design --research "photosynthesis-grade5-research.md" --duration "3 weeks"

Without research (standalone)

/curriculum.design "quadratic equations" --level "9-12" --duration "4 weeks" --goals "Students will solve, graph, and apply quadratics"

JSON output

/curriculum.design "neural networks" --level "graduate" --duration "1 semester" --format json

Help

/curriculum.design --help

Educational Level Adaptations K-5 3-4 objectives per lesson (simpler focus) Heavy emphasis on Remember/Understand/Apply Concrete, observable outcomes Short lesson durations (30-45 min) 6-8 4-5 objectives per lesson Balance Foundation + Analysis Bridge concrete/abstract Standard lesson durations (45-50 min) 9-12 5-6 objectives per lesson Emphasis on Analyze/Evaluate Abstract reasoning expected Extended lesson durations (50-90 min) Undergraduate 4-6 objectives per week/module Emphasize Analyze/Evaluate/Create Discipline-specific thinking Self-directed learning expected Graduate/Post-Graduate 3-5 objectives per course Heavy emphasis on Create Original synthesis and research Expertise-level performance Composition with Other Skills

Input from:

/curriculum.research - Research report informs objectives and structure

Output to:

/curriculum.assess-design - Objectives drive assessment design /curriculum.develop-content - Objectives guide lesson plan creation /curriculum.develop-items - Objectives specify what items should assess Error Handling No research artifact: Proceed with user-provided topic, warn about missing context Duration too short: Warn user objectives may not fit timeframe, suggest adjustment Invalid Bloom's level: Correct to appropriate level for grade Too many/few objectives: Adjust to recommended range for level Exit Codes 0: Success - Curriculum design generated 1: Invalid educational level 2: Duration format invalid 3: Cannot load research artifact (if specified) 4: Insufficient information to create objectives

返回排行榜